- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Research Paper on the Reformation Pt. 2 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Research Paper on the Reformation Pt. 2 Research Papers Criteria Specific rubric for high school students' research papers. Rubric Code: U6CAX2 By chemaign Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

Research Papers
	Fair 3 pts	Good 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts	poor 0 pts
Quotations	Fair Used 4-6Quotations. Some Quotations have signal phrases, quotation marks, citations, and are indented when needed.	Good Used 7-9Quotations. Most Quotations have signal phrases, quotation marks, citations, and are indented when needed.	Excellent Used 10 Quotations. Quotations have signal phrases, quotation marks, citations, and are indented when needed.	poor Did not meet criteria
Summaries	Fair Quoted source rather than summarized. Information is not applicable.	Good Some of the original source is reworded. It is not quite clear how the information is applied.	Excellent Every paragraph has some summary information. Paraphrased and synthesized (applied information)the meaning of the source. Cited the source.	poor Did not meet criteria
Paragraph arrangement	Fair Followed the format of making a statement, giving some information, but the ideas don't build your argument and transitions aren't used.	Good Stated a topic sentence near the beginning that is closely related to the key arguments of the paper. Basic use of transitions. (Missing from 1-3 paragraphs.)	Excellent Stated a topic sentence near the beginning that is one of the key arguments of the paper. Every paragraph has a transition.	poor Did not meet criteria
Introduction	Fair Contains a thesis. Caught reader's attention.	Good Weak yet persuasive thesis statement. Contains a general overview of issue. Caught reader's attention.	Excellent Specific, precise and persuasive thesis statement, yet contains a general overview of issue. Caught reader's attention.	poor Did not meet criteria
Conclusion	Fair Restates the exact same phrasing of the thesis. Reader has a weak sense of what needs to change.	Good Rewords thesis. Reader is contemplating the arguments.	Excellent Creatively restates the main arguments.	poor Did not meet criteria
Grammar	Fair The errors are interfering with the meaning.	Good A few errors remain but the meaning is not affected.	Excellent Edited for spelling, sentence structure, usage, and mechanics.	poor Did not edit for grammar