- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Week 2 Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Week 2 Research Project Rubric Code: TXW7569 By crgray Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Week 2 Research Project
	Exemplary 25 pts	Proficient 22 pts	Emerging 19 pts	Developing 16 pts
Introduction	Exemplary All questions were answered completely and rationales for the answers were clearly stated.	Proficient All questions were answered completely, but rationales for all the answers were not clearly stated.	Emerging Not all questions were answered completely, or greater than 2 rationales for all the answers were not clearly stated.	Developing All questions were not answered completely.
Task	Exemplary All areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the student demonstrated a great deal of thought.	Proficient At least one area of the task was not addressed. The plan followed by the student demonstrated a great deal of thought.	Emerging At least two areas of the task were not addressed. The plan followed by the student demonstrated a moderate level of thought.	Developing The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little effort went into the development of the task.
Originality	Exemplary The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high degree of originality.	Proficient The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The student may have improved upon a previous idea.	Emerging The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low degree of originality.	Developing There were no original ideas expressed in this project.
Grammar, Format, and Spelling	Exemplary The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.	Proficient The final body of work had 1 error related to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.	Emerging The final body of work had 3–5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.	Developing The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.