Skip to main content
iRubric: book review rubric

iRubric: book review rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
book review 
Rubric Code: TX22CCB
By emlawski
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Book Review
  Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction

Unsatisfactory

- Does not introduce the book, or introduces it inaccurately
- No discernable statement about the book’s value
Fair

- Lists basic information, but is not thorough
- No “hook” to catch the reader
- Superficial description of the book’s value
Good

- Includes some information about the book, but is not compelling
- Contains a basic description of the book’s value
Excellent

- Includes necessary information about the book’s background (author, etc.)
- Draws in the reader with a “hook”
- Describes the book’s value
Content

Unsatisfactory

- Addresses only a few of the major themes
- No real discussion of author’s argument and/or perspective
- Few or no examples
- No mention of theory, methodology, sources, etc. - No discussion of strengths or weaknesses
- Illustrates only a passing comprehension of the text
Fair

- Some themes are highlighted but not fully developed
- Argument is addressed, but not explained clearly or thoroughly
- Few examples, and those included lack detail
- Only a passing mention of sources, theory, etc.
- Demonstrates only basic understanding of the text
Good

- Most of the primary themes are adequately addressed
- There is some discussion of the argument
- Examples are generally accurate and detailed
- Includes brief mention of theory, sources, strengths, weaknesses, etc.
- Analysis shows critical thinking skills
Excellent

- Addresses the main themes and arguments in the book
- Evidence and examples (including quotations) are detailed, accurate, and appropriate
- Includes discussion of method, sources, theory, strengths, weaknesses, etc. - Analysis demonstrates critical thinking and insight
Tone/voice

Unsatisfactory

- Uses very casual, informal language not appropriate for college work
Fair

- Has some issues with tone, including contractions, the first person, etc.
- Lacking in sophistication
Good

- Except for a few instances, uses a professional tone
- Lacking in confidence
Excellent

- Uses a professional tone and sophisticated language - Speaks with authority and awareness of audience
Conclusion

Unsatisfactory

- The book’s significance is not addressed in any way
Fair

- Includes only one sentence about the greater significance and/or is very superficial
Good

- Includes only a basic explanation of the book’s significance and usefulness
Excellent

- Includes thorough assessment of the book’s usefulness
- Describes the significance of this work to others
Grammar and Style

Unsatisfactory

- Has significant problems with grammar and style that impede the reader’s ability to comprehend the analysis
- Substantial spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation errors
Fair

- Noticeable grammatical problems (including passive voice, s/v agreement, wordiness, misplaced modifiers, fragments, etc.) - Significant punctuation and capitalization errors
- Several spelling/word choice mistakes
Good

- Contains minor passive voice problems and a few awkward sentences, but otherwise only a few grammatical errors
- Some problems with punctuation (e.g. commas) - Some spelling and/or capitalization errors
Excellent

- Includes no passive voice, awkward sentence constructions, or other grammatical errors
- Very minimal problems with punctuation
- No spelling or capitalization errors
Citations

Unsatisfactory

Includes some citations, but noticeable problems with placement, style, and formation
Fair

- Citations are present, but do not follow specifications (e.g. are in MLA, do not include page numbers, etc.)
Good

- Most citations are formatted APA style
- Most placed appropriately
Excellent

- Citations all formatted correctly (in APA) and placed appropriately in text
Formatting

Unsatisfactory

- Has no page numbers - Has unacceptable font, margins and/or spacing
- Does not meet length requirement
Fair

- Lacks two of the following: page numbers, double- spaced text, the correct font and/or size, or standard margins
- Barely meets length requirement
Good

missing: page numbers, double-spaced text, the correct font and/or size, or standard margins
- Is of the required length

Excellent

- Includes page numbers
- Text is double spaced, in 12 pt. Times New Roman
- Uses standard 1” margins
- Is of the required length





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98