Skip to main content
iRubric: Personal Theory of Counseling Paper rubric

iRubric: Personal Theory of Counseling Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Personal Theory of Counseling Paper 
Personal Theory of Counseling Paper
Rubric Code: SXWA46C
By wayrider
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Beginning

5 pts

Approaching

15 pts

Meeting

20 pts

Exceeding

25 pts

The Nature of People

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.

- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
The Nature of Problems

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.

- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Process of Change

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
My Theory in Practice

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Multicultural Considerations

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Strengths and Limitations

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.

- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
APA
  Significant APA errors

0 pts

Beginner Level

10 pts

Adequate for Purpose

25 pts

Master's Degree Appropriate

30 pts

APA Style & Appropriate Sources

Significant APA errors

-APA style is not used

- sources are not cited and/or referenced
- sources are not scholarly or inadequate
Beginner Level

-Some APA formatting used

- some sources cited & referenced correctly
- some sources appropriate
Adequate for Purpose

- Attempt to use APA format throughout is clear

- sources mostly cited and referenced correctly
-sources are adequate and appropriate
Master's Degree Appropriate

- APA style used almost perfectly

- citations and references all correctly formatted
- sources go above minimum and are used in sophisticated ways
Graduate Level Writing
  Inadequate for Graduate School

0 pts

Intro Graduate Student

5 pts

Adequate for Assignment

15 pts

Master's Degree Level

20 pts

Coherence & Analyses

Inadequate for Graduate School

- Assignment lacks many elements of correct formatting.

- Assignment is inadequate in length/depth of thought.
- Major grammar and punctuation errors.
Intro Graduate Student

- Assignment follows most guidelines.

-Multiple minor grammar and punctuation errors
-Paper is of adequate length/depth of thought
-Sentence structure and word choice errors
Adequate for Assignment

- Assignment follows designated guidelines.

-Assignment is the appropriate length.
-Paper demonstrates depth of thought
-Paper is nearly free of grammar and punctuation errors
Master's Degree Level

- Assignment follows all designated guidelines.

-Assignment is the appropriate length/depth of thought
-Format enhances readability of work.
-Paper demonstrates a mastery of counseling theory and application with real clients
-Paper is "Publish" worthy






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16