Skip to main content
iRubric: Science Project rubric

iRubric: Science Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Project 
Rubric to assess student work and completion of science project
Rubric Code: SXAWB29
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Project Points
  Excellent

17 pts

Very Good

14 pts

Fair

11 pts

Poor

9 pts

Question/Topic

Excellent

Question/Topic is original, specific, measurable, and realistic.
Very Good

Question/Topic is specific, measurable, and realistic.
Fair

Question/Topic is semi-specific, measurable, and realistic.
Poor

Question/Topic is broad and/or unrealistic. Student seems to be confused about purpose of project.
Hypothesis

Excellent

Hypothesis is testable and is in an "If, then" statement. Reasons are given for making this hypothesis.
Very Good

Hypothesis is testable, directly relates to the purpose. Reasons are given for making this hypothesis.
Fair

Hypothesis correlates to the purpose, but is difficult to test. It is not in an" If, then" statement. No reason is given for making this hypothesis.
Poor

Hypothesis does not answer the research question and is not testable.
Materials and Procedure

Excellent

ALL required materials are listed. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed. Independent, dependent variables are listed as well as the constants.
Very Good

Student included all items required. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed, but one step may be missing or confusing. Independent, dependent variables are listed as well as the constants.
Fair

Student included most items required. Steps are logical, but somewhat confusing. Independent, dependent variables are listed as well as the constants.
Poor

Student did not list all necessary items, or use appropriate materials. Steps are not detailed or logical, and/or missing. It would be extremely difficult to follow or duplicate this experiment. Independent, dependent variables and/or constants are not listed or incorrect.
Results (data)/Log Book

Excellent

At least two trials (if experiment allows) were performed.
Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at least 2 of the following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Very Good

At least two trials (if experiment allows) were performed. Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at least 1 of the following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Fair

Only one trial was performed. Results are not easily interpreted and are represented in only 1 of following ways
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Poor

Only 1 trial was performed. It is unclear what the data represents without referring to the written results.
Conclusion

Excellent

Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, and discusses possible explanations for results.
Very Good

Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, showing an understanding of the scientific process.
Fair

Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation, but leaves some confusion.
Poor

Conclusion is confusing and/or does not answer the research question. Student does not attempt to explain if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Display Board/Graphics

Excellent

Display shows an obvious attention to detail and is decorated neatly. All steps of the Scientific process show a logical order. Student provided two or more appropriate graphics.
Very Good

Display shows some attention to detail and is neatly decorated. Most steps show a logical order. At least two appropriate graphics were used.
Fair

Display is decorated moderately neat. Parts of the Scientific process may be out of order or confusing. Student provided one or two appropriate graphics.
Poor

Display is not neat and/or seems haphazardly thrown together. Steps of the Scientific process do not show a logical order. Appropriate graphics were not provided.



Keywords:
  • science project

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16