Skip to main content
iRubric: Essay on Psychosocial Experiences - Latino Population rubric

iRubric: Essay on Psychosocial Experiences - Latino Population rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Essay on Psychosocial Experiences - Latino Population 
German Cultural Essay
Students will submit a essay in which they describe the specific psychosocial experiences and its effect on the Latino population. The student will provide examples of the challenges and issues faced by the Latino population. A comparison and contrast will depict how adaptation and acculturation differ from 1st and 3rd generation Latinos.
Rubric Code: SX73AB9
By nina81665
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

90-100

100 pts

Very Good

80-89

85 pts

Average

70-79

75 pts

Poor

60-69

65 pts

Unacceptable

0-59

55 pts

Psychosocial Experiences

Excellent

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to clearly describe the psychosocial experiences and effects by using research and course materials to gather details<BR>
- Argument is coherent and well supported by referenced sources<BR>
- Includes eight (8) different sources or more (books, the library journals, online journals, etc.)
Very Good

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to describe the psychosocial experiences and effects by using research and course materials to gather details<BR>
- Argument is coherent and supported by referenced sources<BR>
- Includes five (5) different sources or more (books, library journals, online journals, etc.)
Average

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to describe the psychosocial experiences and effects by using research and course materials to gather details<BR>
- Argument is coherent and supported by referenced sources<BR>
- Includes three (3) different sources only (books, library journals, online journals, etc.)
Poor

- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use research and course materials to gather details and argues with little understanding of psychosocial experiences and effects of the Latino population<BR>
- Includes two different sources only (books, library journals, online journals, etc.)
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Analysis of Work or Event

Excellent

- Quotes fully identified: Author, year, page #<BR>
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.<BR>
- Illustrations included and sources indicated<BR>
- Clear and well integrated formal description of experiences and effects to support analysis<BR>
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR>
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.<BR>
- Content and purpo
Very Good

- Quotes fully identified: Author, year, page #<BR>
- Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR>
- Illustrations included and sources indicated<BR>
- Clear formal description of experiences and effects to support analysis<BR>
- Major points are stated and supported.<BR>
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR>
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Average

- Quotes fully identified: Author, year, page #<BR>
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR>
- Illustrations included and sources indicated<BR>
- Formal description included but vague.<BR>
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR>
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR>
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Poor

- Quotes not fully identified<BR>
- Content is incomplete.<BR>
- Illustrations included and but sources are not indicated and images are not referenced within the body of the paper<BR>
- Formal description included but vague or under length necessary to explain the details examined. <BR>
- Major points are not clear or persuasive.<BR>
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Unacceptable

- Quotes not identified and unacceptable.<BR>
- No formal descriptions<BR>
-Illustrations not included<BR>
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Organization & Structure

Excellent

- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.<BR>
- Thesis statement is clear and relates clearly to the content of the paper<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.<BR>
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.<BR>
- Thesis statement is clear and relates to content of the paper. Few<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are present.<BR>
- Conclusion is logical.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. <BR>
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.<BR>
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.<BR>
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.<BR>
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable<BR>
- No identifiable thesis.<BR>
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Grammar and Mechanics

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. <BR>
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable<BR>
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16