Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Member Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Group Member Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Member Evaluation 
Group Presentation Rubric Group Member Evaluation
Groups create a review of an assigned chapter. Present their review to the class. Group Evaluation
Rubric Code: SC8652
By blakemoresr
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Group Member Evaluation
  Failed

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Group Work Ethic

How well member worked within the group
Failed

-Did not work with others at all
Poor

-Cannot work with others in most situations.

-Cannot share decisions or responsibilities.
Fair

-Works with others, but has difficulty sharing decisions and responsibilities.
Good

-Works well with others.

-Takes part in most decisions and contributes fair share to group.
Excellent

-Works well with others.

-Assumes a clear role and related responsibilities.

-Motivates others to do their best.
Contribution to Project

Contributed to all aspects of the project
Failed

-Did not contribute at all
Poor

-Did not work to complete project.

-Input was inaccrurate.

-Little or no creativity was expressed.

-Other group members did much of the work.
Fair

-Incomplete project.

-Input was useful.

-Some creativity was expressed.

-Some work redone by other group members.
Good

-Worked to complete project.

-Input was accurate, and useful.

-Creativity was expressed.
Excellent

-Worked to complete project.

-Input was valuable, accurate, and useful.

-Creativity was expressed and welcomed by the group.
Participation

Was an active member of the group
Failed

-Did not participate
Poor

-Did less work than others

-Did not meet group member(s) at agreed times and places
Fair

-Did almost as much work as others.

-Could be coaxed into meeting with other group member(s).
Good

-Did an equal share of the work.

-Worked agreeably with group member(s) concerning times and places to meet.
Excellent

-Did a full share of the work--or more.

-Took the initiative in helping the group get organized
Cooperation

Showed responsibility to the group by keeping their commitment and accomplishing what was agreed upon
Failed

-Did not cooperate
Poor

-Generally uncooperative in working with others, listening to feedback, and exchanging tasks.
Fair

-Seemed less engaged with others, preferring to work alone.

-Feedback is sometimes
Good

-Offers encouragement to other partners.

-Accepts the comments and feedback of others, but with some reticence.
Excellent

-Organized the information.

-Works very well with others, assisting others as needed.
Attendance

Attendance Was on time and attended group work sessions
Failed

-Did not attend any meetings, in-class or outside of class.

-Did not contribute to GoogleDrive (if applicable).
Poor

-Missed one or more agreed upon meetings.

-Did not attend in-class meeting times.

-Did not contribute to GoogleDrive (if applicable).
Fair

-Was tardy to one or more agreed upon meetings.

-Some contributions to GoogleDrive Documents (if applicable).
Good

-Attended all meetings and was on time.

-Participated in GoogleDrive Documents (if applicable).
Excellent

-Attended all meetings and was on time and prepared to work.

-Was instrumental in arranging work session.

-Consistently updated GoogleDrive documents (if applicable).
Communication

discusses project electronically or in person
Failed

-No attempt at Communication
Poor

-Seemed bored with conversations about the presentation.

-Very slow to or would not answer emails little or no group communication
Fair

-Listened to others; on some occasions, made suggestions.

-Very slow to answer emails (longer than 1 week).

-Seldom or never initiated communication with group
Good

-Participated in discussions about the presentation.

-Answered email in 2-3 days sometimes initiated communication with group.
Excellent

-Provided many ideas for the development of the presentation.

-Prompt response to emails usually 1 day or less often initiating communication with group






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98