- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Flood Plan rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Flood Plan Flood Plan 8-4-19- Use the Design process to develop a system to solve a water related problem. 8-4-13- Provide examples of the way in which technology is used to contain or prevent damage due to flooding. Rubric Code: S6967X By keftoda Draft Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Flood Plan Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Community Plan The students consideration of the community members in event of a flood.	Poor Students have only considered a small classes of people, developed a brief plan that lacks detail, and times are not sensable.	Fair Students have considered most classes of people, developed a reasonable plan for each group of people based on their general location, and have remained sensable throughout.	Good Students have considered all classes of people, developed an exceptional plan for each group of people based on their general location, and have remained sensable throughout while also adding in minor details that could be very benificial in an event such as this.
Flood Technology The students consideration of technology that can be used to slow flooding down.	Poor The students have included very limited factors that could help the flooding. Their ideas are brief and general.	Fair The students have included flood technology that could be used to contain flooding or prevent flooding.	Good The students have included flood technology that could be used to contain flooding or prevent flooding and have included the positive and negaive impacts of each.
General Help Students have considered the people/professionals in a community that could provide help.	Poor The students have only considered obvious community members with no explanation of how they could help.	Fair The students have only considered the obvious community members that could help and have generally stated how they could help.	Good The students have considered a wide variety of community members that could help and have clearly stated how they could help.
Post Flood Students have developed a post plan that is sensable and realistic.	Poor The students have made no consideration of post flood action.	Fair The students have developed a reasonable and sensable post flood plan that could easily be carried out.	Good The students have provided a very detailed reasonable, and sensable post flood plan that could easily be carried out.