Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Grant Writing Course rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Grant Writing Course
Grant Writing Course
Rubric Code:
RX98CA2
By
ldavis3
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Grant Writing Rubric
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Grant Appropriateness
Poor
Grant does not match project.
Fair
N/A
Good
Granting goals and application are a good match.
Writing Style/Mechanics
Poor
Two or more spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Sentence and paragraph structure are weak throughout. Flow of ideas is below expectations.
Fair
One spelling, punctuation, or grammatical error. Sentence and paragraph structure are accurate throughout. The proposal shows a smooth flow of ideas and is well organized.
Good
No spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Sentence and paragraph structure are accurate throughout. Proposal has a smooth flow of ideas and is well organized.
Budget
Poor
Proposed budget is realistic with consideration of the target audience size and stated objectives. A narrative is included.
Fair
Proposed budget is realistic considering the target audience size and stated objectives.
Good
Budget is documented and included in proposal.
Purpose
Poor
No purpose section written; the purpose is not relevant to the topic; purpose is vague and not well explained.
Fair
Purpose section is related to the topic identified; states what the grant will address.
Good
Purpose section indicates and expands upon the issues addressed in the grant; is clearly stated.
Needs Statement
Poor
No needs statement. The description of the needs statement is not well substantiated. No explanation of how the problem is aligned with the goals of the organization.
Fair
The needs statement provides a basic description of the issue but lacks details that explain the need. There is some explanation of how the issue is aligned with the goals of the organization.
Good
The need/problem is clearly identified and a clear explanation of the need is included. The needs statement includes an explanation of how the issue is aligned with the long term goals of the organization.
Goals & Objectives
Poor
There are no goals or objectives stated; goals and objectives are not clearly stated and do not support the proposed project. They are not clearly linked to the project activities. No timeline.
Fair
Goals and objectives are included, but information might be missing including project outcomes. Goals and objectives are not reasonable or achievable. Activity descriptions are inadequate. Timeline is included but does not reflect the overall project expectations.
Good
Goals and objectives are included along with program outcomes. Goals and objectives are tied to program activities which include a description of resources needed to reach goals. A timeline is included for all goals and objectives.
Project Description
Poor
Project description is unclear or incomplete. Supporting details are missing. Project description does not clearly explain how it supports the long term goals of the organization.
Fair
The project description is complete but needs some more details to clarify specific activities. Project is tied to long term goals of the organization, but needs a stronger description to support this.
Good
Project description and its activities are well thought out and will help the organization achieve its long term goals. The stated activities are related to the goals and objectives.
Supplemental Materials
Poor
Materials do not support grant case. Materials are not presented in a clear and easy to follow mannner.
Fair
Most materials support the grant case and are mostly presented in a clear and easy to follow manner.
Good
All Materials are well presented and provide visual and/or additional support for the written grant.
Evaluation
Poor
Evaluation methods are not present or None are in alignment with the goals and objectives of the grant.
Fair
At least one method of evaluation is clearly articulated and aligns with the goals and objectives of the grant.
Good
Evaluation methods are well written and align with the goals and objectives identified in the grant.
Overall Presentation
Poor
Grant was not easy to follow, 5 or more inconsistencies with formatting.
Fair
At least 3 inconsistencies with formatting, sections did not follow order, or were not easy to find.
Good
Formatting was consistent throughout entire grant, sections were clearly labeled, visually appealing.
Keywords:
Grant, writing, nsu
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.