Skip to main content
iRubric: Grant Writing Course rubric

iRubric: Grant Writing Course rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Grant Writing Course 
Grant Writing Course
Rubric Code: RX98CA2
By ldavis3
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Grant Writing Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Grant Appropriateness

Poor

Grant does not match project.
Fair

N/A
Good

Granting goals and application are a good match.
Writing Style/Mechanics

Poor

Two or more spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Sentence and paragraph structure are weak throughout. Flow of ideas is below expectations.
Fair

One spelling, punctuation, or grammatical error. Sentence and paragraph structure are accurate throughout. The proposal shows a smooth flow of ideas and is well organized.
Good

No spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Sentence and paragraph structure are accurate throughout. Proposal has a smooth flow of ideas and is well organized.
Budget

Poor

Proposed budget is realistic with consideration of the target audience size and stated objectives. A narrative is included.
Fair

Proposed budget is realistic considering the target audience size and stated objectives.
Good

Budget is documented and included in proposal.
Purpose

Poor

No purpose section written; the purpose is not relevant to the topic; purpose is vague and not well explained.
Fair

Purpose section is related to the topic identified; states what the grant will address.
Good

Purpose section indicates and expands upon the issues addressed in the grant; is clearly stated.
Needs Statement

Poor

No needs statement. The description of the needs statement is not well substantiated. No explanation of how the problem is aligned with the goals of the organization.
Fair

The needs statement provides a basic description of the issue but lacks details that explain the need. There is some explanation of how the issue is aligned with the goals of the organization.
Good

The need/problem is clearly identified and a clear explanation of the need is included. The needs statement includes an explanation of how the issue is aligned with the long term goals of the organization.
Goals & Objectives

Poor

There are no goals or objectives stated; goals and objectives are not clearly stated and do not support the proposed project. They are not clearly linked to the project activities. No timeline.
Fair

Goals and objectives are included, but information might be missing including project outcomes. Goals and objectives are not reasonable or achievable. Activity descriptions are inadequate. Timeline is included but does not reflect the overall project expectations.
Good

Goals and objectives are included along with program outcomes. Goals and objectives are tied to program activities which include a description of resources needed to reach goals. A timeline is included for all goals and objectives.
Project Description

Poor

Project description is unclear or incomplete. Supporting details are missing. Project description does not clearly explain how it supports the long term goals of the organization.
Fair

The project description is complete but needs some more details to clarify specific activities. Project is tied to long term goals of the organization, but needs a stronger description to support this.
Good

Project description and its activities are well thought out and will help the organization achieve its long term goals. The stated activities are related to the goals and objectives.
Supplemental Materials

Poor

Materials do not support grant case. Materials are not presented in a clear and easy to follow mannner.
Fair

Most materials support the grant case and are mostly presented in a clear and easy to follow manner.
Good

All Materials are well presented and provide visual and/or additional support for the written grant.
Evaluation

Poor

Evaluation methods are not present or None are in alignment with the goals and objectives of the grant.
Fair

At least one method of evaluation is clearly articulated and aligns with the goals and objectives of the grant.
Good

Evaluation methods are well written and align with the goals and objectives identified in the grant.
Overall Presentation

Poor

Grant was not easy to follow, 5 or more inconsistencies with formatting.
Fair

At least 3 inconsistencies with formatting, sections did not follow order, or were not easy to find.
Good

Formatting was consistent throughout entire grant, sections were clearly labeled, visually appealing.



Keywords:
  • Grant, writing, nsu

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16