Skip to main content
iRubric: TP-2AMP7H1-0809 rubric

iRubric: TP-2AMP7H1-0809 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
TP-2AMP7H1-0809 
Module: Thinking practices: critical dialogues in contemporary art and media practices Course: MA in art and media practice at the University of Westminster Assessment summary: essay (80%) and e-tivities (20%) Rubric for theories of practice-based art research blog: http://thinkingpractices.wordpress.com
Rubric Code: R26X2B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric essay
  Distinction

A+ 85-100%
A 75-84%
A- 70-74%

75 pts

Merit

B+ 67-69%
B 64-66%
B- 60-63%

65 pts

Pass

C+ 57-59%
C 54-56%
C- 50-53%

55 pts

Fail/Referral

Fail/Referral
E+ 45-49%
E 40-44%
E- 35-39%

45 pts

theoretical relevance

Distinction

essay engages in depth with the theories of practice-based art research and makes connections to own practice and other sources
Merit

essay engages superficially with the theories of practice-based art research and/or doesn't make connections to own practice and other sources
Pass

essay does not engage with the theories of practice-based art research and doesn't make connections to own practice and other sources
Fail/Referral
writing practice

Distinction

writer has a reflective approach, situating herself in the text (gender, race, artistic and cultural background, etc)
Merit

writer has a partial reflective approach, not situating herself in the text (gender, race, artistic and cultural background, etc)
Pass

writer has a partial reflective approach, not situating herself in the text (gender, race, artistic and cultural background, etc)
Fail/Referral
surface concerns

Distinction

essay is written in a readable manner, following referencing conventions, with correct grammar/spelling
Merit

essay is sometimes not written in a readable manner, skipping referencing conventions, and/ or with correct grammar/spelling
Pass

essay is not written in a readable manner, skipping referencing conventions, and correct grammar/spelling
Fail/Referral
blogging
  Distinction

A+ 85-100%
A 75-84%
A- 70-74%

75 pts

Merit

B+ 67-69%
B 64-66%
B- 60-63%

65 pts

Pass

C+ 57-59%
C 54-56%
C- 50-53%

55 pts

Fail/Referral

E+ 45-49%
E 40-44%
E- 35-39%

45 pts

theoretical relevance

Distinction

blog post engages in depth with the theoretical issues being debated and makes connections to own practice and other sources
Merit

blog post engages superficially with the theoretical issues being debated, being too descriptive or not supporting the argument with connections to own practice or other sources
Pass

blog post does not engage with the theoretical issue being debated
Fail/Referral
blogging practice

Distinction

the post makes use of hyperlinks to images, other online references acknowledging the source, has a title that identifies its content, has tags and categories
Merit

the post makes an imcomplete or limited use of hyperlinks to images or other online references, or does not acknowledge the source, or doesn't have a title that identifies its content, or lacks tags and categories
Pass

the post makes no use of hyperlinks to images or other online references does not acknowledge the source, has no title that identifies its content, has no tags or categories
Fail/Referral
surface concerns

Distinction

the post is written in a readable manner, following blogging conventions, with correct grammar/spelling
Merit

the post is written in a readable manner, but not following blogging conventions, or with incorrect grammar/spelling
Pass

the post is not written in a readable manner, does not follow blogging conventions, and has incorrect grammar/spelling
Fail/Referral



Keywords:
  • theory, art and media practice, essay, blogging, e-tivities


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98