- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Game and Simulation Project Development rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Game and Simulation Project Development Child Development Toy/Game Project Create an educational simulation or game. Document the planning and design process. Rubric Code: QXC292X By elimuds Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12, Graduate

Games & Simulations
	Outstanding 5 pts	Very Good 4 pts	Good 2 pts	Poor 3 pts
Planning Quality 100 %	Outstanding Structure of content is organized and very well thought out. Content shows excellent creativity and originality. Content considers audience, and includes information and game elements that will have value for the user.	Very Good Structure of content is organized and well thought out. Content shows good creativity and originality. Content considers audience, and includes information and game elements that will have value for the user.	Good Structure of content is fairly well organized and thought out. Content shows some creativity and originality. To some extent, the content considers audience, and includes some information and game elements that will have value for the user.	Poor Structure of content is not organized or thought out. Content shows very little creativity and originality. Content does not consider the audience, and includes very little information and few game elements that will have value for the user.
Attractively constructed 100 %	Outstanding Game or simulation is extremely well-put together. Looks professional. No obvious mistakes. A user would wan to interact with it.	Very Good Game or simulation is is well-put together. A lot of care and consideration was put into it. A few mistakes.	Good Game or simulation is is put together fairly well. There are several mistakes; however still fairly solid.	Poor Game or simulation is poorly designed. It will easily fall apart if given to a user. It would not catch and maintain the attention of a user.
Functionality 200 %	Outstanding Game or simulation does what it is intended to do. If a user followed the directions, he/she would easily be able to understand how it is to be used.	Very Good Game or simulation does what it is intended to do. If a user followed the directions, he/she would be able to use it. However, they might have to ask questions of the designer first	Good Game or simulation does what it is intended to do for just part of the time. Therefore the design is not completely though-out.	Poor Game or simulation does only a small portion of what it is intended to do if any.
Enrichment 200 %	Outstanding Game or simulation enriches at least two areas of learning based on the project objectives. It is apparent and easy to determine what areas of learning can be fostered by the use of this product.	Very Good Game or simulation enriches two areas of learning based on the project objectives, but not thoroughly.	Good Game or simulation enriches two areas of learning based on the project objectives, but at a minimum. This means only a little bit of the time it would help in their learning.	Poor Game or simulation does not enrich any areas of learning based on the project objectives.
Originality 100 %	Outstanding This game or simulation is a unique concept and design.	Very Good This game or simulation is loosely based from an already developed toy or game.	Good This game or simulation is mirrored after an already developed toy or game.	Poor This game or simulation is almost a copy of another toy or game.
Age appropriate 100 %	Outstanding A user was given this game or simulation in the age range could successfully complete the activity.	Very Good A user who was given this toy or game in the age range would need a little assistance.	Good A user who was given this toy or game in the age range would need some assistance.	Poor A user who was given this game or simulation in the age range would need a lot of assistance or it would be of little interest (beyond their development). They may unable to use this game.
Materials 100 %	Outstanding All materials are suitable for the age appropriate user.	Very Good Most materials are suitable for the age appropriate user.	Good Some materials are suitable for the age appropriate user.	Poor Materials are not suitable for the age appropriate user.
Development Criteria 100 %	Outstanding The game has all required components but the use and combination of these components has introduced a more exciting and well thought game.	Very Good The game has all required components and has added a few that does not distract from the game but adds depth to the game.	Good The game only has the required components.	Poor The game does not have all required components.
Design 100 %	Outstanding The overall design of the game is totally based on the project plan and is complete with all the elements. The design shows significant planning prior to design and development.	Very Good The overall design of the game is totally based on the project plan and is complete with a majority of the elements. The design shows some planning prior to creation with turning point identified, but lacks some aspects.	Good The design of the game is based on the project plan but it is not complete and is lacking several elements. The design shows some planning prior to creation but does not show turning point or events prior or following.	Poor The design of the game is not based on the project plan and it is not complete and is lacking all or most of the elements. The design shows little planning prior to creation and shows little knowledge of the assignment.
Game Play - Navigation 100 %	Outstanding Game play is easily understandable and can be learned quickly by all players. Character navigation is very easily understood and executed.	Very Good The game is easily understandable and character navigation is sound.	Good Game play can be learned through time and effort by all players. Character navigation is not easily understood.	Poor Game play is overly complicated or overly simple. It may be very difficult to understand for any player. Little or no character navigation.
Higher Order Thinking 100 %	Outstanding To be successful, the game requires players to access and use higher order thinking -- analyzing, evaluating, and creating.	Very Good The game requires players to use some higher order thinking.	Good The game does not require higher order thinking and tends to rely on basic processing -- applying, understanding, and remembering.	Poor The game does not require user to use any higher order thinking.
Player Interest 100 %	Outstanding Players are interested and engaged in the game at all times. Players find it hard to stop - they just want to play more!	Very Good Players are interested and engaged in the game.	Good Players maintain some interest in the game, but not consistently throughout.	Poor Players easily become bored or disengaged in the game.
Game Concept 100 %	Outstanding Game concept is carried over into content in an exceptional way. Obvious effort has been made to use voice and tone to make the content of the game guide feel like an extension of game experience.	Very Good Game concept is carried over into content well. Appropriate use of voice and tone. The content makes the game guide feel like an extension of game experience.	Good Game concept is carried over into content moderately well. Moderate has been made to use voice and tone to make the content of the game guide feel like an extension of game experience.	Poor Game concept is not carried over into content. No use of voice and tone. The content does not make the game guide feel like an extension of game experience.
Visual Planning 100 %	Outstanding Visual planning concept is carried over very well into conceptualized visuals. The design project is planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is clearly demonstrated.	Very Good Visual planning concept is carried over well into conceptualized visuals. The design project is planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is clearly demonstrated.	Good Visual planning concept is carried over moderately well into conceptualized visuals. The design project is planned somewhat carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is fairly well demonstrated.	Poor Visual planning concept is not carried over into conceptualized visuals. The design project is not planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is poorly demonstrated.
Multimedia Design Quality 100 %	Outstanding Design concepts and layout show excellent creativity, originality, and a strike a perfect balance between multimedia.	Very Good Design concepts and layout show good creativity, originality, and a strike a good balance between multimedia.	Good Design concepts and layout show some creativity, originality, and shows some balance between multimedia.	Poor Design concepts and layout do not show creativity or originality, and a strike a poor balance between multimedia.
Documentation Planning and Reportin 100 %	Outstanding Documentation is clean, neat and very well organized. The storyboard clearly shows the structure of your plan for the game guide design. Conceptualized visuals are articulated clearly	Very Good Documentation is clean, neat and organized. The storyboard shows a good sense of the structure of your plan for the game guide design. Most conceptualized visuals are articulated clearly.	Good Documentation is somewhat neat and fairly well organized. The storyboard shows some structure of your plan for the game guide design. Conceptualized visuals are articulated moderately well.	Poor Documentation is cluttered and unorganized. The storyboard does not show the structure of your plan for the game guide design. Conceptualized visuals are poorly clearly.
Technical Writing 100 %	Outstanding Content uses excellent grammar, spelling, and is well written. Paper fully adheres to APA format. Paper is very well organized.	Very Good Content uses good grammar, spelling, and is well written. Paper mostly adheres to APA format. Paper is well organized.	Good Content uses some appropriate grammar, spelling. Writing quality is fair. Paper barely adheres to APA format. Organization is there but weak.	Poor Little or no consideration or effort given to spelling, grammar and writing. Paper does not adhere to APA format. Poorly organized.
Presentation 100 %	Outstanding Student describes and demonstrates game or simulation clearly, enthusiastically, and professionally.Had materials ready for class and worked the entire period.	Very Good Student describes and demonstrates game or simulation.Had materials ready for class and worked most the period.	Good Student describes or demonstrates game or simulation.Didn't have materials ready for class or only worked most of the period.	Poor Student does not share anything about the game and simulation and just turns it in.Didn't use class time; didn't bring materials.

Keywords:

toy game

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric