- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: 3D Water Cycle rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
3D Water Cycle 3D Water Cycle The students created a 3D project of the water cycle. They can use a shoebox with other suggested materials such as cotton balls, clay, markers, labels and pipe cleaners. The goal of this assessment is to see how much the students know and can explain the water cycle. Rubric Code: QXBB448 By AdriaK Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

3D Water Cycle
	Excellent 30 pts	Good 20 pts	Poor 10 pts
Knowledge of water cycle and topic	Excellent The student is very knowledgeable about their topic and their project is presented in a way that shows their knowledge of the water cycle. The students research the water cycle more in-depth to learn more about it and have more knowledge to explain to the class. Transpiration, Infiltration, Evapotranspiration	Good The student showed knowledge of the water cycle but the facts were basic knowledge. The student's research the basic knowledge needed for this project Evaporation, Precipitation, Condensation, Water vapor, Run-Off, Forst, Sublimation	Poor The student's project did not cover all of the basic information of the water cycle Evaporation, Precipitation, Condensation- nothing else
Neatness/Organization	Excellent The project is very organized and neat. The cycle is clear to understand with the steps clearly marked.	Good it was decent but not really organized or neat. The steps of the water cycle were on the project but not easily seen	Poor It wasn't creative or neat. There were no signs of steps of the water cycle.
Creativity	Excellent The student's project is very well done in creativity, 3D, inter-activeness, and fun for others to learn from. The students went the extra mile to make their presentation as unique as possible.	Good The student's project is lacking in creativity, and inter-activeness, and also the student's project is lacking in interest.	Poor The student's project was not 3D or interactive for the learners