Skip to main content
iRubric: COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Assessments Paper rubric

iRubric: COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Assessments Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Assessments Paper 
COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Reaction Paper
Due Tuesday, 11/12@11:55pm. Syllabus Instruction: "This assignment will be graded based on a brief paper (750-1000 words) that shares your thoughts regarding how comfortable you would be using these tools (assessments #2 & #6) in therapy and on how useful you think they would be (both for individuals and couples). Your paper should reference some aspects from both assessments indicating your familiarity with them."
Rubric Code: QBXX55
By pcummins
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Assessments Paper Rubric
Total value 40 points
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

20 pts

Good

30 pts

Excellent

40 pts

Reading Completion
15 %

Responsiveness to Assigned Reading(s)
Poor

.75pts. Response reflects no evidence of assigned readings - off-topic.
Fair

3pts. Although response is on topic, it does not explicitly reflect the assigned readings -- it could have been written without completing the readings.
Good

4.5pts. Somewhat unclear that readings were understood or not all readings explicitly included.
Excellent

6pts. Very clear that all assigned readings were understood by incorporation into reaction.
Personalization
25 %

Exploration of Personal Comfort Level in Using Tools Professionally
Poor

1.25pts. Shows minimal awareness of personal comfort level in using these assessment tools professionally.
Fair

5pts. Identifies personal comfort level, but demonstrates little exploration or understanding of how this might impact use of these assessment tools professionally.
Good

7.5pts. Discusses personal comfort level, including exploration or understanding of how this might impact use of these assessment tools professionally. pact use of these
Excellent

10pts. Deeply describes personal comfort level, including exploration or understanding of how this might impact use of these assessment tools professionally. Identifies areas of discomfort as well and discusses ways to address this professionally.
Application
30 %

Application of Readings to Personal and Professional Self
Poor

1.5pts. No mention of implications of the readings for student's personal or professional attitudes and/or behaviors.
Fair

6pts. Implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes / behaviors minimal or perfunctory.
Good

9pts. Student addresses implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes and/or behaviors.
Excellent

12pts. Student identifies and discusses implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes and/or behaviors in a complex way.
Additional Questions
10 %

Questions Raised by the Readings.
Poor

.5pts. Response does not include any questions raised for the student by the readings.
Fair

2pts. Response includes 1 or more questions, but these are either questions already raised in the readings or questions not directly inspired by the readings. Question(s) are clearly identified
Good

3pts. Response includes 1 or more questions raised by the reading. but the question is yes/no or focused on simple facts -- unlikely to foster discussion. Question(s) are clearly identified
Excellent

4pts. Response includes 2 or more questions raised by the reading(s) that are integrative without a conclusive answer and thus are likely to foster further thought & discussion. Question(s) are clearly identified
Technical Writing
12 %

Grammar, Spelling, Overall Professional Appearance.
Poor

.6pts. Response contains so many typographical and grammatical errors as to be difficult to read.
Fair

2.4pts. Response contains a distracting level of typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines frequently missed.
Good

3.6pts. Response contains minimal typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines closely followed.
Excellent

4.8pts. Response contains nearly zero typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines strictly adhered to in all areas including any sources referenced in the paper.
Use of Words
8 %

Quantity & Efficiency
Poor

.4pts. Less than 750 or more than 1000 words. Tended to be sparse or wordy
Fair

1.6pts. Less than 750 or more than 1000 words, but made good use of allocation.
Good

2.4pts. Between 750 and 1000 words but ended to be sparse or wordy
Excellent

3.2pts. Between 750 and 1000 words. Made good use of allocation.



Keywords:
  • Reaction paper



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98