- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Archaeology Test rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Archaeology Test Archaeology Test This is an attempt at creating a Standards Based Grading Rubric. Rubric Code: Q22X459 By sgallagher Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Archaeology Enter rubric description
	Beginning 1 pts	Progressing 2 pts	Meeting 3 pts
Content Understands how archaeologists interpret complex societies past and present. SSC1	Beginning Students can define key vocabulary words connected to Archaeology. They are able to match the term with the definition.They are able to use some of the vocabulary words to describe and explain the job of an Archaeologist.	Progressing Students can define key vocabulary words connected to Archaeology. They are able to match the term with the definition. They are able to use most of the vocabulary words to describe and explain the job of an Archaeologist.	Meeting Students can define key vocabulary words connected to Archaeology. They are able to match the term with the definition.They are able to use all of the vocabulary words to describe and explain the job of an Archaeologist.
Argumentation Skills Understands and applies the use of a claim and includes evidence to support the claim.SSC3, SSC4	Beginning 1. Writer’s claim is a statement and does not take an arguable position. Claim statements are confusing and difficult to follow. 2. Statement does not answer the central idea of a prompt. 3. Writer’s claim does not introduce any evidence within the claim. 4.Uses “I” statements. 5. Does not introduce the evidence within the claim.	Progressing 1. Writer formulates an arguable statement, but it is not clear. Confusing for reader to follow. 2. Statement partially supports the central idea of a prompt. 3.The claim responds to some aspects of the prompt. 4. Uses “I” statements. 5. Partly introduces the evidence within the claim.	Meeting 1. Writer formulates a clear and arguable statement. 2. Statement fully supports the central idea of a prompt. 3.The claim responds to all aspects of the prompt. 4. Does not use “I” statements. 5. Fully introduces the evidence within the claim.