Skip to main content
iRubric: Programme design Grading Rubric (Honnours)

iRubric: Programme design Grading Rubric (Honnours)

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Programme design Grading Rubric (Honnours) 
Casestudy Grading Rubric (Honnours)
This rubric is for grading student's written assignments.
Rubric Code: PXX3BX3
By Cornelia
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
100 %
  Exceptional

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Substandard

0 pts

Formatting
8 pts

Cover page, Index, introduction, summary, page numbers, references
Exceptional

Includes a cover page, index, introduction, summary, references and page numbers. All of the above are done correctly.
Good

Includes a cover page, index, references and page numbers. All of the above are done correctly.
Fair

Includes most of the following:a cover page, index, references and page numbers. Most of the above are done correctly.
Poor

Includes a few of the following:a cover page, index, references and page numbers.
Substandard

Many of the components are missing and are done incorrectly.
Client describtion
12 pts

Describtion of the client
Exceptional

The client is named and described in detail. All the information given in the case study is included as well as other extra information that will be needed to design a programme.
Good

The client is named and described in detail. All the information given in the case study is included.
Fair

The client is named and described in detail. Most of the information given in the case study is included.
Poor

The client is named but no further detail is described.
Substandard

The client is not named or described at all.
Therapeutic design
28 pts

SOP's, TPO's, EO's, PM's, content and process
Exceptional

- Student gave 1 SOP
- 2 TPO's
- 2 EO's for each TPO
- PM's are included
- The content and process are included and described above average.
- All information given is relevant and inline with the client.
- It is within the time frame of the case study.
Good

- Student gave 1 SOP
- 2 TPO's
- 2 EO's for each TPO
- PM's are included
- The content and process are included and described.
-Most of the information given is relevant and inline with the client.
- It is mostly within the time frame of the case study.
Fair

- Student gave 1 SOP
- 2 TPO's
- 2 EO's for each TPO
- PM's are included
- The content and process are included and described.
-Most of the information given is not relevant and inline with the client.
- It is not within the time frame of the case study.
Poor

Student only included some of the components of the therapeutic design.
Substandard

- Student did not include any SOP's, TPO's, EO's, PM's, content or process.
Programme
20 pts

Programme for the client
Exceptional

- A detailed programme is included with clear indication of a time frame and what will be done.
- The programme address all and more the named outcomes.
- The programm is realistic and practically viable.
Good

- A programme is included with indication of a time frame and what will be done.
- The programme address all the named outcomes.
- The programme is realistic and practically viable for the most part.
Fair

- A programme is included with no clear indication of a time frame and what will be done.
- The programme address some of the named outcomes.
Poor

- The programme is very unclear with no indication of timing.
- The programme do not address the named outcomes.
Substandard

No programme is included.
Activity analysis
12 pts

Activities that will be used in the programme
Exceptional

- Enough activities are included for the programme.
- Backup activities are included.
- All the activities are suitable for the targeted client.
- All activities are thoroughly explained by means of the activity analysis.
Good

- Enough activities are included for the programme.
- All the activities are suitable for the targeted client.
- All activities are explained by means of the activity analysis.
Fair

- Activities are included for the programme, but are not enough.
- Most of the activities are suitable for the targeted client.
- Most of the activities are explained./ Activities are not explained in detail.
Poor

- A few activities are included for the programme.
- Most of the activities are not suitable for the targeted client.
- Activities are barely explained.
Substandard

- Activities are not included in the programme.
- Activities are not suitable for the targeted client.
- Activities are not explained.
Facilitation
16 pts

Facilitation techniques that will be used in the programme
Exceptional

- Enough time are scheduled in the programme for facilitation.
- All the facilitation techniques are suitable for the targeted client.
- All the facilitation sessions and techniques are thoroughly explained.
Good

- Enough time are scheduled in the programme for facilitation.
- All the facilitation techniques are suitable for the targeted client.
- All the facilitation sessions are explained.
Fair

- Time are scheduled in the programme for facilitation but not enough.
- Most of the facilitation techniques are suitable for the targeted client.
- Most of the facilitation sessions are explained.
Poor

- No to very little time is scheduled in the programme for facilitation.
- Most of the facilitation techniques are not suitable for the targeted client.
- The facilitation sessions are barely explained.
Substandard

- No time is scheduled for facilitation.
- No facilitation sessions are discussed.
Technical care
4 pts

Spelling, grammar and punctuation
Exceptional

- Assignment contains less than 1/2 errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation.
- Language is clear and precise.
Good

- Assignment contains very few errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation.
- Language is clear and precise.
Fair

- Assignment contains few errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation.
Poor

- Assignment contains some errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation.
Substandard

- Assignment contains numerous errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation.



Keywords:
  • Writing



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98