Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Argumentative Writing rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Argumentative Writing
Science Argumentative Writing
Should Pluto be a planet? Score: _____ / 21
Rubric Code:
PX75524
By
rcalander
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Generate an Argument
Advanced to Meets
3 pts
Developing/Approaching
2 pts
Poor/Far Below
1 pts
Introduction
Advanced to Meets
Introduction is engaging and outlines the ideas of the writing.
Developing/Approaching
Introduction does not outline the claim, counterclaim, reasons and evidence.
Poor/Far Below
Introduction is not a complete thought or is missing.
Claim
Advanced to Meets
A precise developed claim is present. Explains the relevancy and importance of the topic.
Developing/Approaching
A general claim is present. Acknowledges the relevance but does not explain the importance of the topic.
Poor/Far Below
Claim is not present or it does not address relevance / significance of the topic. A convincing argument is not made.
Counterclaim
Advanced to Meets
Explains the strengths and limitations of a distinguished relevant counterclaim.
Developing/Approaching
There is not a clear distinction between the claim and counterclaim. Some minor errors are present in the counterclaim.
Poor/Far Below
Counterclaim is not present or irrelevant.
Evidence
Advanced to Meets
Claim is well-supported. Multiple pieces of evidence are relevant, accurate and thoroughly explained.
Explains why the evidence was included and how the evidence supports the explanation.
Developing/Approaching
Only one piece of evidence (observation or data) is used. Evidence has minor mistakes and is not explained in detail. Explains why the evidence was included or how the evidence supports the explanation but not both.
Poor/Far Below
Evidence is wrong, repetitive or irrelevant.
Specific reasoning for the claim is not stated.
Science Content / Background
Advanced to Meets
Accurate scientific information is included throughout the writing. Links evidence to an important concept or principle.
Developing/Approaching
The topic is explained, but minor mistakes are made.
Poor/Far Below
The topic is not developed and / or contains major mistakes.
Grammer, mechanics, spelling
Advanced to Meets
There are no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling. Complete sentences.
Logical structure. Transitions clarify relationships. Formal style reflects an objective tone.
Developing/Approaching
There are few errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling, but they do not interfere with understanding. Complete sentences are used but informal language is present, Main ideas are clear, but stray from the claim. Transitions are used but do not connect ideas.
Poor/Far Below
There are numerous errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling. Complete sentences are not used. There are no transitions between ideas.
Concluding Statement
Advanced to Meets
Concluding statement supports the argument and explains implications. Statements are not just repeated from the introduction.
Developing/Approaching
Provides a sense of closure. Concluding statement is present but the statement does not reflect the argument presented.
Poor/Far Below
No concluding statement present that summarizes the argument.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.