Skip to main content
iRubric: The Anatomy Game rubric

iRubric: The Anatomy Game rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The Anatomy Game 
The Cell Geame
Create a board game with visuals to help increase student practice and understanding of tissues and anatomical terminology. This is due on September 30 and students will play all the games to assist with grading this project
Rubric Code: P3377C
By coachltlbit
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric The Anatomy Game Project
  Poor

3 pts

Fair

6 pts

Above Average

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Organization

Poor

The product is not organized and is poorly constructed.

The game cannot be played for 15 minutes or more.
Fair

The product is semi organized and has some proof of planning.

The game can be played, but there are 1 or 2 minor issues.
Above Average

The product is mostly organized but not constructed to the best of ability.

There is only one minor issue
Excellent

The product
is organized, has been thoroughly thought through, and is neatly constructed.

No issues, neat, creative, and easily understood to play yet challenging
Terms

Poor

The product has less than 15 terms/tissues covered.
Fair

The product uses at least 20 terms/tissues covered.
Above Average

The product uses at more than 25 tissues/terms covered
Excellent

The product uses all of the tissues/terms covered.
Quality of information

Poor

The information in the game is too easy and does not challenge students on any level.

There are no terms explained appropriately.
Fair

The information in the game is easy with a few challenging topics for students.
Above Average

Most terms are identified by function/structure appropriately. (at least 15) Allows a deeper understanding and review of terms/tissues.
Excellent

All terms/tissues are identified by function/structure appropriately.

Excellent tool to review.
Creativity

Poor

Very plain, little time was put into design. Not too creative.

Students do not want to play this game
Fair

Semi-original, some time put into design but not carried out to best of ability.
Above Average

Good design, somewhat creative. Arrangement has flaws.
Excellent

Original design, creative idea and arrangement. Workable (can be played without issues and rules match the game.) Everyone wants to play this game when they see it.
Presentation/Game rules

Poor

Weak explanation of product. Skipped over many parts. Did not engage audience.
Fair

Fair explination of product. Skipped over some parts.
Above Average

Good explanation of product. Maybe skipped 1 or 2.
Excellent

Excellent explanation of product. All parts were told to class. Explained visual. Showed how to play)
(Explained the pieces, parts, and places of the game clearly)
Seriousness/Conduct

Poor

Laughing, Silly, Had to stop, Lacking seriousness and good conduct. Body language laxed.
Fair

Fair body language. A few problems with some members.
Above Average

Good body/language. One or two problems with one member.
Excellent

Excellent posture/body language by all of group. (Explained appropriately.) Maintained seriousness.
Smoothness/Planning

Poor

No planning went into the project. Members did not get along and worked individually instead of as a team.
Fair

Weak planning as to who will say what and when. Many transition problems. Can't pronounce words.
Above Average

Mostly planned out. One or two transition problems or questions by 1 or 2 members. Fair audience contact.
Excellent

Planned out presentation. All know what to say and when to say. All are knowledgeable. Good audience contact. All can pronounce words.
Visual

Poor

Sloppy, Falling apart. No time put in it.

Several misspelled words or grammar issues
Fair

Not the best in being nice or neat, but not sloppy either.
Above Average

Mostly nice, neat, colorful, typed or written neatly, fair use of resources.
Only 1 misspelled word.
Only 1 grammar issue
Excellent

Nice, neat, colorful, typed or written very professional, good use of resources. Some talent.

No misspelled words and no grammar issues.
Readiness

Poor

Turned in late is not accepted at all.
Fair
Above Average

Project on time. Missing something/someone.
Excellent

On time. Ready to present. All people and parts/extras are here.



Keywords:
  • tissues, anatomical terminology


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98