Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Advanced CS 1 Fall Final Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Advanced CS 1 Fall Final Project
Final Finch 2.0 Robot Culminating Project
Rubric Code:
P2454C9
By
kmilliken
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Robot Task Assessment
No Attempt
0 pts
Basic
3 pts
Satisfactory
4 pts
Master
5 pts
Participation/Teamwork
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
Students never brainstormed ideas about a robot. One person made all the decisions. Teacher observed team members occasionally interacting, discussing, posing questions to each other, exchanging and rethinking ideas.
Satisfactory
Most students were involved in brainstorming ideas about a robot, not everyone had an equal voice. Teacher observed most team members interacting often, discussing, posing questions to each other, exchanging and rethinking ideas most of the time.
Master
All students were actively involved in brainstorming ideas about a robot and everyone's ideas were listened to and considered. Teacher observed all team consistently members interacting, discussing, posing questions to each other, exchanging and rethinking ideas all of the time.
Programming / Research
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
One student did all the programming or research.
Satisfactory
Programming or research was shared throughout the team, ideas were given but not utilized
Master
Programming or research was a team effort, everyone on the team contributed an idea.
Time management
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
Code or research is incomplete due to unwise use of time
Satisfactory
Code or research is complete but there are errors due to poor time management
Master
Code or research is completed correctly within the set time period.
Presentation Time
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
Presentation was less than two minutes or more than 6 minutes.
Satisfactory
Presentation was 3-4 minutes.
Master
Presentation was 5 minutes.
Project approval
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
Project was not approved by teacher.
Satisfactory
Minimal project details were provided to teacher.
Master
Complete project details were provided to teacher.
Presentation
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
Presentation covers some of the topics specifics.
Satisfactory
Presentation covers most of the topics specifics.
Master
Presentation covers ALL of the topics specifics.
Peer Feedback
No Attempt
NOT ENOUGH TO ASSESS
Basic
Peer feedback was ok.
Satisfactory
Peer feedback was good.
Master
Peer feedback was great!
Keywords:
NXT Project
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.