- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: 1960's Project Grading Rublic rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
1960's Project Grading Rublic Explains what criteria had to be met to earn credit. Rubric Code: NX9WB94 By educahuard Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

1960's Project Grading Rubric
	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Background Information 10 pts General knowledge of their topic	Poor Failed to show they had an understanding of their group or person.	Fair Showed they had some knowledge of their group but didn't have a complete understanding.	Good Some students had a great understanding while others did not.	Excellent Clearly had strong grasp of who their group or person was as well as information regarding the meaning of them.
Significance of Group and Events 10 pts Impact of group	Poor Key events were left out of presentation and little knowledge of significance shown.	Fair Some of the key events were shown while the significance and others were missing.	Good Most key events were covered and understood.	Excellent All of the key events involving this group were touched on. Understanding of the significance was shown.
Participation 10 pts Effort put in by each student	Poor Failed to show they worked as a group.	Fair Group worked together only when necessary.	Good Worked well as a group throughout the entire project. Each student did their fair share.	Excellent Students eagerly helped each other. Students did their work as well as exceeding what was expected of them.
Media 10 pts Effort put into creating presentation	Poor Media created was hard to follow or lacked effor	Fair Media lacked some effort but covered most key points	Good Media was easy to follow and the effort put into it was obvious	Excellent Students put extensive time into the media making sure everything was included and it was creative.
Presentation 10 pts Explanation given to the class	Poor Seemed as though they went into the presentation without practice.	Fair Presentation was unorganized and needed more practice.	Good Presentation went well but had flaws throughout.	Excellent The presentation seemed well-thought out and practiced. Went very smooth and efficiently.