iRubric: Wanted by the FBE Poster rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Wanted by the FBE Poster Rubric Code: NX6AA78 By swck2012 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Wanted by the FBE
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 6 pts	Excellent 8 pts
Neatness	Poor Poster is disorganized, barely legible, and messy.	Fair Poster is somewhat organized, readable, and neat.	Good Poster is mostly organized, readable, and neat.	Excellent Poster is organized, readable, and neat.
Mug Shot	Poor Element's Mug Shot is not present.	Fair Element's Mug Shot is present but not complete. The illustration somewhat relates to the element and its properties.	Good Element's Mug Shot is present and complete. The illustration mostly relates to the element and its properties.	Excellent Element's Mug Shot is present and complete. The illustration clearly relates to the element and its properties.
Element Info, including Bohr Model	Poor The element's info is missing, incomplete, or inaccurate. Descriptions are lacking, and there's no evidence of creative thought. Bohr model is missing.	Fair Some parts of the element's info are present. Descriptions are included but aren't thorough or accurate. Bohr model is missing.	Good Most parts of the element's info are present and complete. Descriptions are mostly accurate and creative. Bohr model is present but incorrect.	Excellent All parts of the element's info are present and complete (name, alias, family, DOB, address, and identifying marks). Descriptions are accurate and creative. Bohr model is present and correct.
Description	Poor Element's description lacks information about the element's physical properties and is poorly written.	Fair Element's description includes some of the element's physical properties but lacks proper grammar and creativity.	Good Element's description includes most of the physical properties of the element and is written in mostly complete sentences with few grammatical errors.	Excellent Element's description includes its physical properties and is written in complete sentences. Description is creative.
Wanted For	Poor "Wanted for" includes no uses and/or what it does and is poorly written.	Fair "Wanted for" only includes 1-2 uses and/or what it does and is poorly written.	Good "Wanted for" includes some of the element's uses and/or what it does but lacks creativity in the writing.	Excellent "Wanted for" includes the element's current uses and/or what it does. It is well-written in a creative format.
Warning	Poor "Warning" is absent and/or incorrect.	Fair "Warning" somewhat describes the element's reactivity and/or is poorly written.	Good "Warning" mostly describes the element's reactivity and is well-written.	Excellent "Warning" describes the element's electronegativity and includes description of element's reactivity and is written creatively.