- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: WebQuest Evaluation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
WebQuest Evaluation Rubric Rubric Code: NX383XA By kchandler Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Criteria Overall Design Components
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 8 pts
Visual Enhancements	Poor Small use of graphics Lack of color and design	Fair Use of graphics but limited in connecting knowledge and concepts	Good All elements connect the student making significant contributions
Technicalities	Poor Significant (4 or more) unusable links, images, and grammatical errors	Fair A few broken or irregular links and images Grammatical errors	Good Mechanical problems non-existent. Positive and continual working elements
Navigation	Poor Constant breaks in navigation Easy confusion; limitation of flow	Fair Parts cause confusion and limit flow Uneasy navigation	Good Continual and easy navigation Learner quickly understands use of Web Quest
Introduction Student Connection and Engagement	Poor Does not draw on interest of student Fails to relate to experience of students Fact based only	Fair Somewhat engages students Poses questions of limited interest and understanding	Good Immediately engages students encouraging them to make personal connections Relates to student interests and understanding
Tasks Levels of Comprehension Activated	Poor Only encourages students to retell information heard	Fair Encourages comprehension but limited in ability to connect with student	Good Promotes higher order thinking skills, problem solving ethics, and understanding
Process Precision and Flow	Poor Students lack understanding of tasks, objectives, and steps involved	Fair Students have some indication of expectations but students lack focus and intention	Good Process clearly indicated Students understand objectives, purpose, and steps of involvement
Evaluation	Poor Effective learning unable to be measured or obtained	Fair Learning is evaluated through indicated criteria	Good Successful and effective learning indicated by descriptors throughout rubric Student knowledge clearly measured and evaluated
Conclusion Resources	Poor Limited to no resources used Resources do not connect with details	Fair Resources have some involvement and connection with details	Good Resources clearly connect with details and information taught Use of varying resources to enhance learning experience