Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: STUDENT Emergency Video Assessment Rubric

iRubric: STUDENT Emergency Video Assessment Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
STUDENT Emergency Video Assessment Rubric This rubric is a list of Key actions for the student to identify while viewing real-time Fire and Emergency calls. It is designed for the student to identify key factors in Fire Ground activities based upon items identified in the accompanying objectives for the lesson contained in the video http://youtu.be/3An--A68_Rk The Objectives are based upon industry standard qualifications for Fire Service Company Officers Rubric Code: MXW3A2B By perk0911 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Vocational Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

STUDENT RUBRIC Emergency Scene Video Assessment
	Excellent No Flaws or obvious errors Extremely clear and concise communication. Direct, decisive action Exemplary utilization of strategies, tools, tactics and equipment, personnel and apparatus. Safety was ultimate concern for ALL individuals on scene no unnecessary risks taken 5 pts	Above Standard Few flaws or obvious errors Very clear and concise communication. Decisive action that needed explanation Proper utilization of strategies, tools tactics and equipment, personnel and apparatus. Safety was concern for ALL individuals on scene but weighed against outcome incurring acceptable risks 4 pts	Standard Few flaws or obvious errors Strained yet clear and concise communication. Immediate action taken that needed explanation Utilization of strategies, tools tactics and equipment, personnel and apparatus in rudimentary fashion. Safety was concern on scene but no additional measures taken to assure greater safety consciousness 3 pts	Below Standard Flaws or obvious errors Strained unclear or garbled communication. Delayed action taken that needed explanation. Utilization of strategies, tools tactics and equipment, personnel and apparatus in unusual or nonstandard fashion. Safety measures not taken at all times, no safety personnel identified on scene. 1 pts	Unacceptable Major Flaws or obvious errors No communication of Conditions actions needs garbled communication. Delayed, none or inappropriate action taken according to strategies and tactics Personnel, apparatus tools equipment,used in unsafe and counter productive measures. No safety measures instituted or put into place late in the operation. 0 pts
SECTION I Concentrate only on the items in the left column under Section I Start the Video from http://youtu.be/3An--A68_Rk
*Incident Command CMD= Command ICP= Incident Command Post	Excellent CMD est. 15≤ seconds of arrival ; ICP ID ≤15 seconds; ICS scaled to Incident; Single, Unified, Area concepts; CMD-held/passed/transferred	Above Standard CMD est. ≤30 seconds of arrival ; ICP ID ≤30 seconds; ICS Scaled over/under; Single, Unified, Area concepts applied late; CMD-held/passed/transferred with delay	Standard CMD est. ≥30 seconds of arrival ; ICP ID ≥45 seconds; ICS Scaled over/under; Scope of emergency seen with prompting; CMD held/passed/transferred with prompt	Below Standard CMD est. ≥60 seconds of arrival ; ICP ID ≥1.5 min; ICS Scaled over/under without recognition; Scope of emergency identified > 3 min after arrival; CMD held/passed/transferred inappropriately	Unacceptable CMD not est.; ICP not est.; ICS Scale inappropriate for incident; Scope of emergency not identified; CMD not held /passed/transferred.
*Command Presence 3 Task Rule= assigning only 3 tasks at one time to one person or resource	Excellent Clear, decisive iteration of strategies/tactics ≤15 secs., tertiary assignments est. in logical fashion using “3-task-rule” based upon incident needs , establishes clear line of scene authority ≤15 secs.	Above Standard Clear, decisive iteration of strategies/tactics ≤30 secs., tertiary assignments est. in logical fashion ≤45 secs, based upon incident needs; establishes scene authority ≤30 secs.,	Standard Clear, iteration of strategies/tactics ≤45 secs., tertiary assignments est. in logical fashion ≤1.5 min., based upon incident needs; establishes scene authority ≤1.5 min.	Below Standard Unclear, iteration of strategies/tactics ≤1.5 min., tertiary assignments given late >2 min./ too many at once., Not applicable to incident needs; establishes weak scene authority >3 min.	Unacceptable Unclear or no iteration of strategies/tactics, tertiary assignments not given or given too late to be effective, not applicable to incident needs; No scene authority established.
*Fire Behavior "Go- No-Go" = take action or chose to take no action "No Go", and inaction are NOT the same inaction = paralysis	Excellent Indentifies ≤15 secs. Current mode of fire progression; Applies decisive tactical /strategic behaviors based upon probable knowns. Relates ‘Go No Go’ ≤15 secs. based upon current /anticipated observations.	Above Standard Indentifies ≤30 secs. Current mode of fire progression; Applies decisive tactical /strategic behaviors based upon knowns. Relates ‘Go No Go’ ≤ 30secs. based upon current /anticipated observations.	Standard Indentifies ≤45 secs. Current mode of fire progression; Applies basic tactical /strategic behaviors based upon knowns. Relates ‘Go No Go’ ≤ 45 secs. based upon current /anticipated observations.	Below Standard Indentifies >1 min. Current mode of fire progression; Demonstrates hesitancy applying tactical /strategic behaviors based upon multiple knowns. Hesitates in ‘Go No Go’ decision> 1min. based upon current observations.	Unacceptable Cannot correctly Indentify current mode of fire progression >1.5 min.; Demonstrates inability to apply tactical /strategic behaviors even in low-variable unknowns. Defaults into inappropriate ‘Go No Go’ decision > 1.5 min. based upon current observations.
SECTION II Concentrate on the areas in SEC. II only Start the Video again from the beginning
*Life Preservation Often implies not used each and every time	Excellent Accounts for incident priorities based on life safety; Consistently enacts Risk vs Benefit analysis; Promotes appropriate risk based upon knowledge of current conditions and Variables; Provides for self-preservation in lose/lose situations.	Above Standard Accounts for incident priorities based on life safety; often enacts Risk vs Benefit analysis; Promotes acceptable risk based upon knowledge of current conditions and Variables; Provides conditions for self-preservation in lose/lose situations.	Standard Accounts for incident priorities based on life safety; utilizes Risk vs Benefit analysis; Promotes acceptable risk based upon knowledge of current conditions; Provides conditions for self-preservation in lose/lose situations.	Below Standard Often accounts for incident priorities based on life safety; Often utilizes Risk vs Benefit analysis; Promotes unacceptable risk based upon knowledge of current conditions; Promotes conditions for unnecessary risk in lose/lose situations.	Unacceptable Does Not account for incident priorities based on life safety; Fails to utilize Risk vs Benefit analysis; Encourages unacceptable risk based even in the face of current conditions indicating low probability of success; Fosters conditions for unnecessary risk taking in all situations.
*Strategies/Tactics Mission Creep= overlapping duties unassigned to resource that can impair assigned tasks. Freelance= Unassigned task that interferes with strategy	Excellent Identifies and Communicates Strategy for incident ≤15 secs.; Chooses or Assigns Tactical portions to resources≤30 secs; Recognizes and implements transitional strategies where applicable; Demonstrates discipline within given assignment; Avoids 'Mission creep’	Above Standard Identifies and Communicates Strategy for incident ≥30 secs.; Chooses or Assigns Tactical portions to resources ≥60 secs; Recognizes transitional strategies delayed in implementation; Demonstrates discipline within given assignment; Avoids ‘mission creep’	Standard Identifies and Communicates Strategy for incident ≥45 secs.; Chooses or Assigns Tactical portions to resources ≥1.5 min; Recognizes transitional strategies, may or may not implement; Demonstrates discipline within given assignment; Avoids ‘mission creep’	Below Standard Identifies and Communicates Strategy for incident ≥ 1 min.; Chooses or Assigns Tactical portions to resources ≥2 min.; Defaults into Tactical activities, is found off-task from command; Recognizes transitional strategies so late as to make them ineffective; Demonstrates weak discipline with given assignment off task in tactical position; Is involved in ‘mission creep’ activities	Unacceptable Does not Identify or Communicate Strategy for incident; Fails to Assigns Tactical portions to resources; Defaults into Tactical activities, is found off-task from command; Does not recognizes transitional strategies ; Lacks discipline with given assignments off task in tactical position; Freelances
*Safety Benchmarking- setting standard times to events on emergency scenes and gauging progress work -loads on	Excellent Identifies/Assigns a Safety resource < 1.5 min.; Predicates all actions on Risk vs Benefit analysis; Provides numerous resources that address Safety utilizing benchmarking; Sets incident tempo /work loads according to current resources, known /anticipated variables; Anticipates/acts to develop incident safety plan;	Above Standard Identifies/Assigns a Safety resource < 2 min.; Predicates actions on Risk vs Benefit analysis; Provides resources that address Safety utilizing benchmarking; Sets incident tempo /work loads according to current resources, known variables; Anticipates/acts to develop incident safety plan;	Standard Identifies/Assigns a Safety resource < 3 min.; Predicates actions on Risk vs Benefit analysis; Provides few resources that address Safety / benchmarking; Sets incident tempo /work loads according to current resources, variables; Acts to develop incident safety plan.	Below Standard Identifies/Assigns a Safety resource < 5 min.; Predicates actions on Risk vs Benefit analysis; does not provide resources that address Safety Benchmarking; Sets incident tempo /work loads inconsistent with current resources or variables; Acts to develop incident safety plan with prompting.	Unacceptable Does not Identify/Assign a Safety resource.; Fails to predicate actions on Risk vs Benefit analysis; does not provide resources that address Safety /benchmarking; Sets incident tempo /work loads to levels that endanger current resources due to variables; Omits or cannot develop incident safety plan with prompting.
SECTION III Concentrate on the areas in SEC. III only Start the Video again from the beginning
*Resources / Tools/ Equipment Res.= Resources	Excellent Res. Ideal for current and anticipated conditions; Provides Res. for all aspects of length of emergency; Plans for unforeseen contingencies; ; Tool application to jobs for greatest efficiency and effectiveness;	Above Standard Res. Sufficient for current / anticipated conditions; Provides Res. for multiple aspects of emergency; Plans for known contingencies; Applies tools to jobs efficiently;	Standard Res. meet current conditions; Provides Res. For current aspects of emergency; Plans for known contingencies; Applies tools to jobs efficiently;	Below Standard Res. not sufficient for current / anticipated conditions; Does not Provide Res. for current aspects of emergency; Does not plan for known contingencies; Applies tools to jobs in less than efficient manner	Unacceptable Fails to realize need for additional resources; Does not apply current resources to current conditions; Does not plan for contingencies, Tools applied inappropriately/ dangerously
*Property / Environment Salvage= Saving of non damaged property ICS= Incident Command Chain Plans section= ICS section responsible for development of long term plan /efforts/ resources	Excellent Enforces ‘treat others[property]as you wish [yours] to be treated’; encourages ‘leave it better than you found it mentality/actions’. Take steps to anticipate resources req’d for salvage of property. Provides for economy of resources in mitigation efforts; Establishes environmental impact resource through ICS and Plans section.	Above Standard Encourages ‘treat others[property]as you wish [yours] to be treated’; recommends ‘leave it better than you found it mentality/actions’. Takes steps to anticipate resources req’d for salvage of property. Provides for resources in mitigation efforts; Establishes environmental impact resource	Standard Completes mitigation tasks with ‘treat others[property]as you wish [yours] to be treated’ ; reminds others to adopt ‘leave it better than you found it mentality/actions’. Anticipates resources req’d for salvage of property; Considers establishing environmental resource	Below Standard Completes mitigation tasks with ‘treat others[property]as you wish [yours] to be treated’ ; Fails to remind others to adopt ‘leave it better than you found it mentality/actions’. Anticipates resources req’d for salvage of property; considers environmental impact late in incident causing undue additional work	Unacceptable Does not Complete mitigation tasks with ‘treat others[property]as you wish [yours] to be treated’ ; Fails to remind others to adopt ‘leave it better than you found it mentality/actions’. Disregards needed resources req’d for salvage of property;Does not consider incident impact on environment
Enter Title	Excellent	Above Standard	Standard	Below Standard	Unacceptable

Keywords:

Fire Video Assessment- STUDENT

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Vocational rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16