iRubric: Tech Invention Final rubric

Level 1

demonstrates limited ability to show how their tech invention works through the use of drawing/drafting or design software.

rough drawings with limited detail

no captions or explanations

13

Level 2

demonstrates some ability to show how their tech invention works through the use of drawing/drafting or design software.

detailed digital or hand drawings

some explanations

16

Level 3

demonstrates good ability to show how their tech invention works through the use of drawing/drafting or design software.

some explanations that assess the pros and cons of this invention as well as the technology already out there that supports or competes with it.
19

Level 4

demonstrates exceptional ability to show how their tech invention works through the use of drawing/drafting or design software.

detailed digital or hand drawings from several angles are provided

detailed explanations are provided that assess the pros and cons of this invention as well as the technology already out there that supports or competes with it.

24

had some example research of tech inventions, but not the 5 required with photos and a 1-2 sentence about the invention.

Had very little research on technology that supports their invention or the tech that they are improving.

13

had 5 examples of research of tech inventions, but not the required with photos and a 1-2 sentence about the invention.

Had some research on technology that supports their invention or the tech that they are improving.

15

had 5 examples of research of tech inventions, with the required with photos and a 1-2 sentence about the invention.

Had enough research on technology that supports their invention or the tech that they are improving.

17.5

had 5 or more examples of research of tech inventions, with the required with photos and an insightful 1-2 sentence response about the invention.

Had comprehensive research on technology that supports their invention or the tech that they are improving.

22.5

Written work was often not presented in full sentences with grammar and citation as required.

Visual organization and missing elements made it hard to assess or understand work handed in OR work was incomplete and was submitted in a form that was hard to understand and assess.


The required presentation format was not used effectively

8

Written work was sometimes presented in full sentences with grammar and citation as required.

Visual organization and elements submitted helped assess or understand work handed in to some degree in and/or work was mostly complete and was submitted in a form that was mostly understandable.

10
6

The required presentation format was used somewhat effectively.

Written work was presented in full sentences with grammar and citation as required.

Visual organization and elements submitted supported the understanding of work handed in and work was complete.

The required presentation format was used effectively.

12.5

Written work was presented in full sentences with grammar and citation as required.

Visual organization and elements submitted supported and enhanced the understanding of work handed in and work was complete.

The required presentation format was used in a very comprehensive a professional way.

14