Skip to main content
iRubric: Mouse Trap Vehicle Report rubric

iRubric: Mouse Trap Vehicle Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Mouse Trap Vehicle Report 
Mouse Trap Vehicle Report
Rubric Code: L3586A
By tajala
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Mouse Trap Vehicle Report
Enter rubric description
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Title Page
1 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

60% or more of the components necessary for a complete title page exist.
Fair

80% or more of the components necessary for a complete title page exist.
Good

All components required for the title page exist and are located correctly.
Abstract
2 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

Does not completely explain the report in a concise manner. Purpose and objective of the work are unclear.
Fair

Does not completely explain the report in a concise manner. Purpose of the work is stated.
Good

Approximately one paragraph. Tells detailed information about the report. Contains objectives of the work.
Table of Contents
1 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

Table of contents exists. But page numbers and sections are missing or inaccurate.
Fair

Table of contents exists but is missing page numbers or sections that are required.
Good

Table of contents exists with page numbers and all required sections of the report listed.
Introduction
2 pts

Poor

Is wordy or lacking information. Material is not related to what is in the report.
Fair

Is either wordy, lacking information or not related to the material in the report.
Good

Short brief explanation of the activity is complete and accurate.
Brainstorming
1 pts

Poor

Less than 5 rainstorming ideas given or discussed.
Fair

Brainstorming ideas are provided, but not discussed.
Good

Brainstorming ideas provided and fully described / discussed.
Design Selection
3 pts

Poor

Design is discussed, but why it was chosen is not.
Fair

Design is given. Little or no discussion provided for why or how design was selected / developed. Little or no discussion of main feature of the design.
Good

Design is fully described. Good description of selection process from brainstorming ideas. Main feature fully described.
Construction Process
2 pts

Poor

How the construction of the vehicle compared to the design not discussed.
Fair

Description of construction process provided, but no analysis of how the construction effected the vehicle's performance given.
Good

Detailed description of construction process given. Analysis of how construction enhanced or detracted from vehicle performance is provided.
Competition Performance
2 pts

Poor

Minimal information provided on competition.
Fair

Competiton rankings are briefly discussed. Little reasoning for rankings given.
Good

Competition ranks given and detailed reasoning for vehicle performance provided.
Vehicle improvements
2 pts

Poor

Very short description of possible improvements provided with no engineering reasoning.
Fair

Vehicle faults are described. Short list of improvements and recommendations are given. Little reasoning for improvements given.
Good

Vehicle faults are described. Improvements and recommendations for vehicle design are fully described and explained. Reasoning for improvements are fully detailed.
Materials
1 pts

Poor

Not all materials for project are not listed.
Fair

Design materials are given.
Good

Design materials are given and reasoning for material usage is discussed.
Conclusion
2 pts

Poor

Student has a summary that does not match the work in the activity.
Fair

Summary is too long or does not explain what the student accomplished.
Good

Student has a summary of what he/she learned and what the activity was all about.
Appendix
3 pts

Poor

Drawings and Schematics are just thrown in the back, are not labeled or do not exist.
Fair

Appendix holds information that does not belong. Appendix is labeled incorrectly.
Good

All large pieces of information are in an appendix. Each appendix is labeled and holds information such as schematics, and drawings.
Citations
1 pts

Poor

Few sources that were used are cited and the format has not been followed.
Fair

Some of the sources the student used are not cited and are not formatted correctly.
Good

All information gathered by the student has been cited with the proper format.
Written Report Format
2 pts

Poor

Report has many mistakes in grammar and spelling with no evidence of proof reading. Font size and margins are inappropriately used. Pronouns were used freely throughout the report.
Fair

Report has a few mistakes in grammar and spelling. Report is typed, but has some areas where fonts are excessively large or small. A few pronouns were used.
Good

Report was written in professional manner with no personal pronouns and appropriate grammer, spelling, and evidence of proof reading. Report is typed neatly with appropriate fonts and margins.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98