Skip to main content
iRubric: Adv Exp Design Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Adv Exp Design Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Adv Exp Design Research Paper 
Adv Exp Design Research Paper
Statement of Thesis, Quality of Idea, Organization, Style and Grammar, References, Method, Results, Discussion, APA Style
Rubric Code: L296B8
By Ravenne
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  Target

4 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Emerging

2 pts

Unacceptable

1 pts

STATEMENT OF THESIS

Target

Thesis or topic is clear and explicitly stated. The reader can underline the thesis.
Acceptable

Topic is clear, but not explicitly stated. The reader must search for the thesis and eventually finds words to identify it.
Emerging

The topic or thesis is alluded to, but never clearly stated. The reader must surmise the thesis, but is able to identify allusions.
Unacceptable

There is no topic or thesis identifiable. The reader finds no words or phrases that identify a topic or thesis.
QUALITY OF IDEA

Target

Hypothesis has strong theoretical basis. Has at least one manipulated independent variable.
Acceptable

Hypothesis has adequate theoretical basis. Has one manipulated independent variable.
Emerging

Hypothesis has little or no theoretical basis. Has one manipulated independent variable.
Unacceptable

Hypothesis has little or no theoretical basis. Has no manipulated independent variable.
ORGANIZATION

Target

The organization is complete and logical with a progression of ideas leading to a conclusion. Transitions allow the reader to follow the content without disruption.
Acceptable

There is a logical progression with occasional breaks in flow of content. Lack of transitions disrupts the flow for the reader.
Emerging

Logical progression is minimal with disconnected ideas. The reader has difficulty following the development of the topic.
Unacceptable

There is no logical progression in the development of the thesis or topic. Ideas are disconnected and disruptions in flow confuse the reader.
STYLE AND GRAMMAR

Target

Vocabulary is precise, appropriate. The writing expresses clarity and accuracy in information. Grammar is error free, with maybe a minor error.
Acceptable

Vocabulary is appropriate; some phrases need work. Grammar is mostly error free, with not more than three errors.
Emerging

Vocabulary is weak rather than precise. There are numerous grammar errors.
Unacceptable

Vocabulary is inadequate to the topic and incorrect. There are many grammar errors.
REFERENCES

Target

References are sufficient (more than 10). Key or classic references are included. All references are well-chosen for this study.
Acceptable

References are adequate (8-10). Most references are well-chosen for this study.
Emerging

References are minimal (5-8). Some references are only marginally related to this study.
Unacceptable

References are less than minimal (less than 5). Key or classic references not included. Some references are only marginally related to this study.
METHOD

Target

Design is appropriate. Method provides practical way to implement the design.
Acceptable

Design is appropriate. Method provides awkward, but doable implementation.
Emerging

Design is appropriate. Method is seriously flawed.
Unacceptable

Design does not allow adequate test of hypotheses. Method is seriously flawed.
RESULTS

Target

Data analysis is done correctly, reported clearly and is complete.
Acceptable

Data analysis is done correctly. Report is generally clear and complete.
Emerging

Data analysis has some errors or is incomplete. Clarity of report needs improvement.
Unacceptable

Data is analyzed incorrectly. Report is incomplete and is not clear.
DISCUSSION

Target

Results are discussed in terms of hypotheses, theory, practical implications, and future research. Discussion is logical.
Acceptable

Most results are discussed in terms of most of the following: hypotheses, theory, practical implications, and future research. Discussion is usually logical.
Emerging

Some results are discussed in terms of some of the following: hypotheses, theory, practical implications, and future research. Discussion often lacks logic.
Unacceptable

Few results are discussed in terms of any of the following: hypotheses, theory, practical implications, and future research. Discussion lacks logic.
APA STYLE

Target

APA style is used correctly (note esp. headings, citations, reference list, results, tables and figures)
Acceptable

APA style is used with only few or minor errors or omissions (note esp. headings, citations, reference list, results, tables and figures)
Emerging

APA style is used with several or major errors or omissions (note esp. headings, citations, reference list, results, tables and figures)
Unacceptable

Many major APA style errors or omissions (note esp. headings, citations, reference list, results, tables and figures)






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16