Skip to main content
iRubric: Civic Action: Stop Food Waste rubric

iRubric: Civic Action: Stop Food Waste rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Civic Action: Stop Food Waste 
Public Awareness Campaign: Bullying and Peer Pressure
Students will incorporate information from group and individual research investigations into a visual representation following the specified criteria.
Rubric Code: L23837X
By pahernandez1981
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Visual Product/Project
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

16 pts

Fair

14 pts

Poor

10 pts

Display Content

Excellent

Student created a representation directly related to assigned topic. Display reflects complete understanding of topic. Awareness of the issue is clearly communicated and a viable solution is presented.
Good

Student created a representation related to assigned topic. Display reflects understanding of topic. Awareness of the issue is communicated and a viable solution is presented
Fair

Student created a representation that is somewhat related to assigned topic. Display reflects little to no understanding of topic. Awareness of the issue is somewhat communicated and a viable solution is presented
Poor

Student created a representation that is somewhat or not at all related to assigned topic. Display reflects student does not have an understanding of topic. Awareness of the issue is not communicated and a viable solution is presented
Work Effort/Professionalism

Excellent

The work was done well, to the best of the learner's ability. Quality time and effort was put into the presentation. The completed product is Superior in quality and free of misspellings, mistakes or any other mistakes that may detract from the overall quality of the product.
Good

The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this display and presentation. The completed product is of Good quality with minimal (1-2) misspellings, mistakes or any other mistakes that may detract from the overall quality of the product.
Fair

Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed or done with lack of effort. The completed product is of Decent quality and with some (3-5) misspellings, mistakes or any other mistakes that may detract from the overall quality of the product.
Poor

Lack of effort on the learner's part. Work is incomplete. Learner is capable of doing better. The completed product is of Poor quality and with several (6+) misspellings, mistakes or any other mistakes that may detract from the overall quality of the product.
Originality/Creativity

Excellent

Representation was very creative. Appearance is neat, well thought out, and obvious effort was made to create representation of topic.
Good

Representation was fairly creative. Appearance is neat, thought out, and some effort was made to create representation of topic.
Fair

Representation was somewhat creative. Appearance is neat but not thought out. More time was needed to show effort was made to create representation of topic.
Poor

Representation was not creative. Appearance is only somewhat neat or not neat at all. Not thought out or evidence of effort was not made to create representation of topic.
Topic

Excellent

The overall topic of the presentation is direct and relevant to the Economics of the issue. The overall message does not stray from the main topic, nor does it detract from the overall message of the presentation.
Good

The overall topic of the presentation is somewhat direct and relevant to the Economics of the issue. The overall message does slightly stray from the main topic, and does detract from the overall message of the presentation slightly.
Fair

The overall topic of the presentation is indirect and irrelevant to the Economics of the issue. The overall message does stray from the main topic, and does detract from the overall message of the presentation slightly.
Poor

The overall topic of the presentation is not direct and completely irrelevant to the Economics of the issue. The overall message strays significantly from the main topic, and does not mention or reinforce the overall message of the presentation at all.
Collaboration

Excellent

Representation of product/project is direct or complete reflection of excellent collaborative work. Group obviously functioned well as a group.
Good

Representation of project is almost a complete reflection of group work. Evidence of group functioning as a group is present.
Fair

Representation of project is only somewhat or not very reflective of group work. Evidence of group functioning as a group is present or not present at all.
Poor

Representation is not very reflective of group work. Evidence of group functioning as a group is not present at all.



Keywords:
  • Civic Action: Presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16