Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Interviewing in Professions Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Interviewing in Professions Rubric
Interview/Shadow Rubric
This rubric will be used for grading the summary of your professional interview and/or job shadow.
Rubric Code:
KX4W92X
By
migarash
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Points
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Average
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Introduction/Thesis
10
Excellent
The focus and main point of the is clearly evident in the opening paragraph. Stated who, when, & where. Also, include the date of the interview and the person’s job.
Good
The focus and main point of the work is mostly supported. Stated who, when & where only.
Average
The focus and main pont of the work is not clearly identified and may be confusing to the reader. Provided only who and when
Poor
The focus and main point is not defined.
Voice
40
Excellent
Articulated thoughts on the experience. Clearly discussed ways the experience will influence student's future.
Good
Limited discussion of the experience. Give vague ways the experience will influence student's future.
Average
Brief mention of thoughts on the experience; did not elaborate. No mention of the influence on student's future.
Poor
Did not articulate their experience or writing is unclear.
Organization & Structure
10
Excellent
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
-Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
-Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Good
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.
Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor
- Organization and structure detract from the message.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
5
Excellent
Student demonstrates consistent correct us of the rules of grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Good
Student demonstrates consistent correct us of the rules of grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling, with a few minor errors.
Average
Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor
-Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
MLA
5
Excellent
-Student puts quotation marks around every direct quote.
-Student introduces quotes.
-Student follows every quote with explanation and relevance.
Good
-Student puts quotation marks around most direct quotes.
-Student introduces most quotes.
-Student follows most quotes with explanation and relevance.
Average
-Student puts quotation marks around some direct quotes.
-Student introduces some quotes.
-Student follows some quotes with explanation and relevance.
Poor
-Student does not put quotation marks around every direct quote.
-Student does not introduce quotes.
-Student does not follow every quote with explanation and relevance.
Works Cited Page
5
Excellent
WC page is included and properly formatted following MLA guidelines.
Good
WC page is included but vaguely follows MLA guidelines.
Average
WC page included but follows no formal guidelines.
Poor
No WC page.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
Nursing
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.