Skip to main content
iRubric: SUST.101 Participation rubric

iRubric: SUST.101 Participation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SUST.101 Participation 
SUST.101 Participation
RWU SUST 101 Participation Rubric
Rubric Code: JX2334X
By lbeith
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Poor=D

Cannot be changed

1 pts

Fair=C

Cannot be changed

2 pts

Good=B

Can include Criteria below but must include your added criteria

3 pts

Excellent=A

Must include your added criteria with evidence of Awareness, Integrity, Authenticity, and Commitment.

4 pts

Preparation

Enter description
Poor=D

makes spontaneous but uninformed comments, obvious that required pre-reading not completed.
Fair=C

Comments are informed but lack completeness of comprehensive preparation
Good=B

Student has read and understands assigned materials and shows understanding through homework assignments and constructive conversations.
Excellent=A

Student has read assigned materials and initiates and contributes to discussion more than once. Student gets a great amount of sleep to be active during discussions.
Articulation

Enter description
Poor=D

mispronunciation, poor use of words, poorly organized ideas
Fair=C

Uses jargon, common expressions rather than appropriate technical terms
Good=B

Comments made are clear and organized and others clearly understand the topic of discussion.
Excellent=A

Comments made are always insightful and constructive with the appropriate and relevant use of language to express ideas or comments. Comments made open up doors for further discussion.
Presentation

Enter description
Poor=D

Speaks too softly for all to hear, addresses only the instructor, monotone, upspeak
Fair=C

Inconsistent in presentation, needs reminding,variable style, mannerisms
Good=B

Students has rehearsed presentation, makes partial eye contact, and keeps audience interested with questions
Excellent=A

Students has rehearsed presentation, does not read from slides, makes eye contact all of the time, and keeps audience engaged with question and answer sessions.
Participation Frequency

Poor=D

does not contribute or alternately dominates discussion
Fair=C

Irregularly participates
Good=B

iInitiates questions and comments as well as participates by completing assignments
Excellent=A

Constantly initiates questions and comments that provokes responses from other students. Constantly listening and understanding every discussion.
Vocabulary

Poor=D

Uses cliche's, mundane vocabulary, uses terms incorrectly
Fair=C

Inconsistent in use of proper terms
Good=B

Uses terms and vocabulary relevant to the topic.
Excellent=A

Uses terms and vocabulary learned from readings, previous lectures, or outside relevant knowledge in discussions to further the discussion.
Receptive

Poor=D

defensive, demeans others' comments, talks over them, or disregards feedback
Fair=C

Is respectful and listens, but does not apply feedback
Good=B

Listens to others and considers feedback from others
Excellent=A

Listens attentively when others speak and shows this by contributing to the dialogue in an appropriate manner. Constantly making eye contact with the speaker.
Originality/creativity

Poor=D

restatement of readings or comments already offered
Fair=C

Unconventional ideas but may not be well thought out or practical
Good=B

Always presents original views and different perspectives that shows effort of thinking was made
Excellent=A

Always presents views that are original and have different perspectives than others. Contributes aspects architecturally in designing the group project.
Inclusion

Poor=D

does not mention others or further develop ideas previously discussed
Fair=C

Implies contributions of others and bases argument on previous contributions
Good=B

Always contributes by adding and building on to comments made by the professor or peers
Excellent=A

Always contributes by adding and building on to comments to keep a thoughtful conversation going within the classroom. Relevant contributions to the project to further the progress of the project.
Rhetoric

Poor=D

argues opinion or emotion without evidence
Fair=C

Provides weak or inconsistent evidence or reasoning
Good=B

Support assertions and arguments with evidence
Excellent=A

Always provides evidence to support assertions and arguments relevant to the discussion and project.
Relevance & value

Poor=D

tangential or pedantic
Fair=C

Contributes on portions or segments, but misses the big picture
Good=B

Provides valuable information that others find informative
Excellent=A

Comments are always pertinent to the topic and provides valuable information that others can learn from.



Keywords:
  • RWU, SUST 101, SUST.101


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16