Skip to main content
iRubric: Manager of Multiple Patients Self-Reflection Assignment rubric

iRubric: Manager of Multiple Patients Self-Reflection Assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Manager of Multiple Patients Self-Reflection Assignment 
Manager of Multiple Patients Self-Reflection Assignment
Instructions Write a 5 page self-reflection paper related to a significant experience you identified in your journal. Include the following elements: 1. Recreate the scenario identifying the key participants & a detailed description of the series of events. 2. Describe your thoughts & feelings regarding this experience. 3. Describe your assumptions & point of view. 4. What is the purpose of reflecting on this? What question is at issue? Where do your assumptions come from? Were they valid? What information did you rely on to help understand this experience? What other sources of information could have been used? 5. What are the implications/consequences of your thinking about the event? What conclusions can you draw? 6. Based on this event, identify objectives or goals on how you can improve future practice in the role of manager of multiple patients. Describe how you plan to achieve your goals.
Rubric Code: J36BBB
By rstraby
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Criterion
Points are based on quantitative data identified with each descriptive
  Poor (Qualitative)

Did not adhere to instructions

0 pts

Fair (Qualitative)

Did not identify and discuss major elements

1 pts

Good (Qualitative)

Major elements identified and discussed, but not all information addressed

2 pts

Excellent (Qualitative)

Clear and concise description of all elements

3 pts

Interpretetation of Event
10 pts

1. Identifies verbal and written data nad nonverbal cues. Recognizes problems.
2. Explains the the scenario and personal viewpoint
3. Considers others' viewpoints
Poor (Qualitative)

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
Fair (Qualitative)

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good (Qualitative)

- Content is comprehensive.
- Major points are stated clearly.
- Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Excellent (Qualitative)

Content is thorough, accurate, and relates to a specific event

Major points are specific, stated clearly, and are well-supported.

Writing is clear and succinct
Analysis of Event
10 pts

1. Identifies the reasons/opinions/arguments pro and con
2. Examines variables and data fro relationships
3. Differentiates fact from opinion
4. Judges data, information, and viewpoint using appropriate criteria
Poor (Qualitative)

- Organization and structure detract from the concepts of the paper.
- Concepts are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair (Qualitative)

- Structure of the paragraph is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Concepts are disconnected
Good (Qualitative)

- Concepts of the paragraphs are clear and easy to follow.
Excellent (Qualitative)

-Concepts of paragraphs are filled with details of support for thesis and topic sentences.
- Paragraphs flow into each other with connective concepts.
Format
10 pts

Poor (Qualitative)

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting. [APA style]

- Paragraphs are inadequate/excessive in length.

- Too much
Fair (Qualitative)

- Paper follows most guidelines.

- Paper is over/ under word length.

- Some padding of paragraphs
Good (Qualitative)

- Paper follows designated guidelines.

- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Excellent (Qualitative)

-Paper follows designated guidelines
[APA style]
-Paper is appropriate in length

-Succinct and scholarly presentation

-websites are cited
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 pts

Poor (Qualitative)

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Fair (Qualitative)

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Good (Qualitative)

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently varied structure.
Excellent (Qualitative)

Correct grammatical construction
-free of typos
- compound/complex sentences
-clear, correct technical vocabulary

Strong use of correct language structure.
-Correct puncutation
Punctuality
10 pts

All portions of the paper were handed in on time
Poor (Qualitative)
Fair (Qualitative)
Good (Qualitative)
Excellent (Qualitative)

Bibliography____
Outline____
Rough Draft___
Final paper___






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16