Skip to main content
iRubric: UN Web Quest rubric

iRubric: UN Web Quest rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
UN Web Quest 
Holocaust Web Quest
A WebQuest for UN Secretary-Generals
Rubric Code: H898B4
By huilin
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Group Report
80%
  Ethan Hunt

100 pts

Masterspy

90 pts

Junior Spy

80 pts

Back to spy school

70 pts

Thesis

Ethan Hunt

Has a clear, well-developed thesis that addresses and evaluates the main question.

There is a complete understanding of the UN Secretary General
Masterspy

Has a clear thesis that addresses the main question.

There is a good understanding of the UN Secretary General.
Junior Spy

Has a weak thesis that responds less adequately to the main question. Presents central idea in general terms. Thesis usually does not acknowledge other views.

There is a general understanding of the UN Secretary General.
Back to spy school

Does not respond to the main question. Lacks a thesis or central argument, and simply restates the main question without evaluating it.

There is a shallow understanding of the UN Secretary General.
Argument

Ethan Hunt

Supports the thesis with well-elaborated arguments.

Demonstrates exemplary understanding of the issue(s) at stake, identifying and addressing the key concepts or main ideas.

Appropriate application of concepts and historical understandings.

Acknowledges alternative perspectives and has provided at least 1 counter-argument.
Masterspy

Supports the thesis with arguments.

Demonstrates understanding of the issue(s) at stake, identifying and addressing some of the key concepts or main ideas.

Applies concepts and historical understandings correctly.
Junior Spy

Arguments insufficiently address thesis.

Marginal or poor understanding of the issue(s) at stake, poorly or incorrectly identifying and addressing a key concept or main idea.

Many concepts and historical understandings applied incorrectly.
Back to spy school

No attempt to develop the central argument.

Does not identify or address the key concepts or ideas.

No understanding of the presented issue(s).

Does not try to apply concepts or historical understandings.
Evidence and Examples

Ethan Hunt

Substantiating the arguments with several examples.

Examples are pertinent, well-chosen, and free from factual error.

All facts are verified by reliable sources. Facts corroborate each other and have no contradictions.

Clear links drawn between argument and evidence.
Masterspy

Substantiating some of the arguments with examples.

Examples are relevant and relatively free from factual errors.

Most facts are verified by reliable sources. Some facts have unreliable or unverified sources. Facts do not contradict each other.

Links drawn between argument and evidence.
Junior Spy

Does not provide enough examples for the arguments.

There may be some factual inaccuracies.

Some facts are verified by reliable sources. Most facts are unreliable or unverified. There may be some contradiction.

Attempts to draw links between argument and evidence, but not executed well enough.
Back to spy school

No attempt to substantiate arguments with examples.


Veracity of facts is questionable. Contradiction between evidence.
Internet Use

Ethan Hunt

Successfully uses suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.

Information extracted from websites are clearly and properly cited.
Masterspy

Usually able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.

Information extracted from websites are cited, with a few inconsistencies.
Junior Spy

Occasionally able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance.

Information extracted from websites are cited, with numerous errors and inconsistencies.
Back to spy school

Needs assistance or supervision to use suggested internet links and/or to navigate within these sites.

Information extracted from websites not cited at all.
Organization and Grammer

Ethan Hunt

Information is very organized

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Masterspy

Information is organized.

Few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Junior Spy

Information needs to be more organized.

Many grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.


Language consistently lacks clarity, sentence structure may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.
Back to spy school

The information appears to be disorganized.

Numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Impossible for the reader to follow thinking from sentence to sentence.
WebQuest Process
10%
  Ethan Hunt

10 pts

Masterspy

8 pts

Junior Spy

6 pts

Back to spy school

4 pts

Teamwork

Ethan Hunt

The group functioned exceptionally well. All members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. The group (all members) was almost always on task!
Masterspy

The group functioned pretty well. Most members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. The group (all members) was almost always on task!
Junior Spy

The group functioned fairly well but was dominated by one or two members. The group (all members) was almost always on task!
Back to spy school

Some members of the group were often off task AND/OR did not contribute to others in the group AND/OR were typically disregarded by other group members.
Receptive to Feedback

Ethan Hunt

Consciously reflects upon the Teacher's feedback, and judiciously improves on the problematic areas.
Masterspy

Acknowledges Teacher's feedback by improving on the highlighted problematic areas.
Junior Spy

Acknowledges Teacher's feedback.

Little attempt to improve on the highlighted problematic areas.
Back to spy school

No attempt to take into consideration Teacher's feedback.
Presentation
10%
  Ethan Hunt

10 pts

Masterspy

8 pts

Junior Spy

6 pts

Back to spy school

4 pts

Delivery

Ethan Hunt

All team members participated.

Very clear, distinct pronunciation and appropriate volume.

Demonstrates mastery over the content, and exhibits clear comprehension of the project.

Very well-paced and meets time requirement exactly.

Maintains eye contact throughout presentation.
Masterspy

Most team members presented.

Clear pronunciation and volume.

Demonstrates good grasp of the content and is familiar with the project.

Well-paced and almost meets time requirements.

Maintains eye contact for most of presentation.
Junior Spy

Minority of the group presented.

Unclear voice and volume.

Demonstrates satisfactory understanding and familiarity with the project.

Poorly paced; does not meet time requirements.

Some eye contact with class.
Back to spy school

One person presents.

Indistinct voice and volume.

Poor understanding of the content. Reads directly off the screen.

Very poorly paced; does not meet time requirements.

No eye contact with class.
Design

Ethan Hunt

Very easy to follow.

Very appealing and creative.

All slides/pages have appropriate graphics and background.
Masterspy

Easy to follow.

Fairly appealing and creative.

Many slides/pages have appropriate graphics and background
Junior Spy

Difficult to follow.

Barely appealing or creative.

Some slides/pages have appropriate graphics and background.
Back to spy school

Impossible to follow.

Not appealing or creative.

No use of graphics; no use of background



Keywords:
  • Webquest, UN

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16