Skip to main content
iRubric: Contraception Presentation rubric

iRubric: Contraception Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Contraception Presentation 
Rubric Code: GX53WBX
By aobyle
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Presentation Requirements
  Excellent

3 pts

Good

2 pts

Fair

1 pts

Poor

0 pts

Title

Excellent

N/A
Good

Birth control method is prominently displayed on page
Fair

Birth control method is displayed on page, but does not stand out
Poor

Birth control method is not displayed
Organization

Excellent

Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lines to group related materials
Good

Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed
Fair

Content is logically organized for the most part
Poor

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
Picture requirement

Excellent

5+ pictures were included AND explained during the presentation; pics are relevant to method
Good

4 pictures were included AND explained during the presentation; pics are relevant to method
Fair

3 pictures were included AND explained during presentation; pics are somewhat relevant to method
Poor

Less than 3 pictures were included AND explained; OR pictures were included but were not explained at all during the presentation.
Video requirement

Excellent

Video was linked to or embedded in presentation; met the time requirement of 30 seconds - 2 minutes; content was extremely valuable to audience
Good

Video was linked to or embedded in presentation; was less than 30 seconds over time requirement; content was valuable to audience
Fair

Video was linked to or embedded in presentation; was more than 30 seconds over time requirement; content was somewhat valuable to audience
Poor

Video was linked to or embedded in presentation; was more than 30 seconds over time requirement; content was unrelated to topic; link did not open/work during presentation
Time requirement

Excellent

Presentation was at least 3 minutes.
Good

Presentation was between 2:30 - 2:59.
Fair

Presentation was between 2:01 - 2:29.
Poor

Presentation was less than 2 minutes.
Content Requirements
Who uses method

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter. (2 pts)
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates (1.5 pts)
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
How does method work?

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
How does consumer use method?

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Prescription / OTC

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter. (2 pts)
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates (1.5 pts)
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
STI Protection

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter. (2 pts)
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates (1.5 pts)
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Cost of method

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Effectiveness of method

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Comparison

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Advantages

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Disadvantages / Side effects

Excellent

Content was completely accurate and fully explained to the class; students appeared extremely knowledgeable about subject matter.
Good

Content was completely accurate, explanation was somewhat vague to classmates
Fair

Content was accurate, but was missing 1-2 key pieces of information; information was read, not really explained.
Poor

Content was included on fact sheet, but was not presented to the class; or content was included but inaccurate.
Sources

Excellent

3 credible sources were provided. (3 pts)
Good

2 credible sources were provided. (2 pts)
Fair

1 credible source was provided. (1 pt)
Poor

0 sources were provided, or sources were not credible. (0 pts)




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98