Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Astronomy Controversies Debate rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Astronomy Controversies Debate
The Great Debate - Tuck Everlasting
Rubric Code:
GX3XX29
By
KBrobst
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Understanding of Topic
Excellent
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information convincingly.
Very Good
The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
Needs Improvement
The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
Poor
The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Opening Statement
Excellent
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way. Opening statement is 2:30-3 minutes long.
Very Good
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way. Opening statement is 2-2:29 minutes long.
Needs Improvement
Opening statement attempts to clearly define the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points. Opening statement is less than 2 minutes long.
Poor
Opening statement doesn't define the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons. Opening statement is less than 1 minute long.
Major Point 1
Excellent
Point #1 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and/or examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Very Good
Point #1 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and/or examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Needs Improvement
Point #1 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and/or examples to support their answer.
Poor
Point #1 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail an/or example to support their answer.
Major Point 2
Excellent
Point #2 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and/or examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Very Good
Point #2 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and/or examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Needs Improvement
Point #2 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and/or examples to support their answer.
Poor
Point #2 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail and/or example to support their answer.
Major Point 3
Excellent
Point #3 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and/or examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Very Good
Point #3 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and/or examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Needs Improvement
Point #3 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and/or examples to support their answer.
Poor
Point #3 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail and/or example to support their answer.
Rebuttal
Excellent
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to accurately defend position. Rebuttal time is 2:30-3 minutes long.
Very Good
Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to defend position. Rebuttal Time is 2-2:29 minutes long.
Needs Improvement
Some of counter arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was somewhat able to defend position. Rebuttal Time is less than 2 minutes long.
Poor
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Was unable to defend position. Rebuttal time is less than 1 minute long.
Closing Statement
Excellent
Closing statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way. Closing statement is 2:30-3 minutes long.
Very Good
Closing statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way. Closing statement is 2-2:29 minutes long.
Needs Improvement
Closing statement attempts to clearly sum up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points. Closing statement is less than 2 minutes long.
Poor
Closing statement doesn't sum up the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons. Closing statement is less than 1 minute long.
Respect for Other Team
Excellent
All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Very Good
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Needs Improvement
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Poor
Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Work Submission
Excellent
All work (script and MLA Works Cited) was submitted on time and in the correct format (Google Doc or hard copy).
Very Good
Needs Improvement
Poor
All work (script and MLA Works Cited) was not submitted on time and/or in the correct format (Google Doc or hard copy).
Subjects:
English
Science
Education
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.