Skip to main content
iRubric: Paramecium Project - Poster rubric

iRubric: Paramecium Project - Poster rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Paramecium Project - Poster 
Students research paramecia. They discover what paramecia are and describe them, taking note of internal structures. They include information about their size as well as how they move, feed, eliminate waste and reproduce. Students can choose between an essay, presentation and a poster to present their project.
Rubric Code: GAC722
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Paramecium Project - Poster
  Very Poor

0 pts

Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Great

5 pts

What is a paramecium?

Very Poor

This question is not answered at all.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

The student has attempted to answer this question, but has made some mistakes.
Or
The answers is highly technical and clearly just copied from somewhere.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Project handed in a day late.
Great

The student has answered this question well.
Description

Very Poor

The student has not included a description of a paramecium at all.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

The student has included a poor description.
Or
Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

The student has included a basic description.
Or
The description is highly technical and clearly just copied from somewhere.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Many of the structures have been included in the description, but some major parts have been left out.
Or
Project handed in a day late.
Great

The student has included an accurate and detailed description of the paramecium's structures, inside and out.
Labeled Diagram

Very Poor

There is no picture.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

Some of the structures have been labeled accurately.
Or
Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

Many of the structures have been labeled accurately.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Most of the structures have been labeled accurately.
Or
Project handed in a day late.
Great

All of the structures have been labeled accurately and clearly.
Size

Very Poor

No indication of size.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

Student has given only one size, instead of a range.
Or
Student has given a size range, but it is inaccurate.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Project is handed in a day late.
Great

Student has given an accurate size range.
Movement

Very Poor

No indication of how a paramecium moves.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

Student has attempted to explain how paramecia move, but has some misconceptions and/or makes no/inaccurate reference to structures that help the paramecia move.
Or
The explanation is highly technical and clearly just copied from somewhere.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Project handed in a day late.
Great

Student has explained, with accurate reference to structures, how paramecia move without being overly technical. The explanation demonstrates understanding.
Feeding and Waste Elimination

Very Poor

No information on how paramecia feed or eliminate waste.
Or
The projected was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

Information on either only feeding or only waste elimination.
Or
Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

Information on both feeding and waste elimination presented with some mistakes in the explanation of both functions.
Or
The explanation is highly technical and clearly just copied from somewhere.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Information on both feeding and waste elimination presented with minor mistakes in the explanation of one of the functions.
Or
Project handed in a day late.
Great

Information on both feeding and waste elimination presented clearly and accurately. Correct terminology is used without being overly technical. The explanation demonstrates understanding.
Reproduction

Very Poor

No information on paramecia reproduction.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

Inaccurate information on paramecia reproduction.
Or
Highly technical explanation of the reproduction of paramecia included.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Project handed in a day late.
Great

Accurate information on paramecia reproduction presented in a clear and simple way using correct terminology without being overly technical. Explanation demonstrates understanding.
Poster Layout

Very Poor

There is no project.
Or
The project was handed in more than 5 days late.
Poor

The poster is extremely untidy and difficult to read.
Project is handed in 5 days late.
Fair

The poster layout is a bit untidy and tough to follow, but most of the information is readable.
Or
The project is handed in 2 days late.
Good

Project handed in a day late.
Great

The poster has a logical, uncluttered layout. The information is easy to read and understand.



Keywords:
  • Paramecium, functions

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98