- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Peer Evaluation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Peer Evaluation Rubric Peer Evaluation Rubric Rubric Code: FX6C289 By jacqueline1 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
	GOOD 5 pts	FAIR 3 pts	POOR 1 pts	POINTS EARNED (N/A)
PEER EVALUATION RUBRIC
Preparation	GOOD Presentation was "ready to go" when it was this group's turn.	FAIR Presentation was "almost ready to go". We had to wait for the group to copy the presentation on to the chart.	POOR The group did not have the presentation completely ready and was finalizing some things as class began and/or while other students were presenting.	POINTS EARNED
Organization	GOOD Information was presented in a logical and interesting sequence that was easy to follow.	FAIR Information was somewhat difficult to follow because student "jumped around" from topic to topic.	POOR There was no coherent flow to the information presented.	POINTS EARNED
Overall Presentation	GOOD An outstanding presentation. The presentation kept me interested and was among the very best in class.	FAIR A good presentation. However, the presentation did not always keep my interest.	POOR The presenter displayed little knowledge and understanding of the components of the assignment.	POINTS EARNED
Questioning	GOOD Able to answer all questions with appropriate language or able to ask some questions . Use of Accountable Talk is evident .	FAIR Some questions were not answered or asked only one or 2 questions . Not consistent in using Accountable Talk.	POOR Weren't able to answer any questions or didn't ask any questions.	POINTS EARNED
Collaboration	GOOD The teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation	FAIR The teammates worked from others’ ideas most of the time. And it seems like every member did some work, but not all did in the presentation.	POOR The teammates never worked from others’ ideas. It seems as though only a few people worked on the presentation	POINTS EARNED