iRubric: Printmaking I: Drypoint (Rev3/CTP) rubric

-The sketches and final work clearly demonstrate a personal vision, individual mark-making, and innovative ideas and/or risk-
taking.
-The work demonstrates a distinct integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.

- The sketches and final work generally demonstrate original and innovative ideas, with some personalization.
-The work demonstrates a general integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.

- The sketches and final work demonstrates attempts at originality
- Attempts at innovation
with materials and techniques seem to be emerging.
-The work demonstrates limited integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.

- An idea behind the work is presented, but the ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely
mostly on appropriation.
- The work demonstrates limited signs integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.

- An idea behind the work may be presented, but the work comprises trite or simplistic
solutions that are poorly executed.
- The work does not demonstrate any integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.

-The work is technically excellent.
-All 5 prints are turned in and all 5 are of outstanding quality.
- All parts of the image are clear and the borders are clean on the BAT.
- Plate tone is intentional.
- 3 Color Trial Proofs of excellent quality.
- Curation is invisible.
- All of the prints are titled, signed/dated, and labeled in pencil.

-The work is technically strong.
- All 5 prints in the edition are turned in.
- Most parts of the image are clear and the borders are clean on the BAT.
- Plate tone is generally consistent and intentional.
- The 3 CTP prints are of very good quality.
- Curation is somewhat invisible.

-The work demonstrates developing technical competence and use of materials and media.
- All 5 prints in the edition are turned in. 3 of the prints are good quality.
- BAT has some inconsistencies and may not be entirely intentional.
- There is particular variation in inking and/or registration in CTP's.
- Prints have some curation, but could benefit from additional curation.
- Prints are lacking one of the following: title, signature, label.

- The work demonstrates marginal technical competence.
- Inking is not consistent, registration is inconsistent, edges are dirty on BAT.
- Prints may have stray marks or fingerprints.
- Automatic if 4 or fewer prints turned in.
- No curation evidence.
- Prints are lacking more than one of the following: titled, signed/dated, numbered, in pencil.

-The work is generally inept; use of materials and media lacks skill or technical
competence.
- The prints are messy, damaged or smeared.
- Automatic if 3 or fewer prints turned in.

- The student is always prompt and on task in the studio & follows the directions for the project the first time they are given.
-Student consistently cleans up their work area in a timely fashion.
- The student consistently respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student consistently offers constructive critiques to peers.

- The student is almost always on task, and follows directions for the project.
- Student cleans up his/her work area in a timely fashion, with minimal reminders.
- The student frequently respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student usually offers constructive critiques to peers.

-The student's participation does not reflect one of the following: being on time, being on task, following directions for the project, and cleaning up his/her work area in a timely fashion.
- The student generally respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student could offer additional constructive critiques to peers.

- The student is frequently late, off task in the studio, may not follow directions, or delays cleanup.
- The student sometimes shows respect for classmates.
-The student rarely offers constructive critiques.

- The student does not follow directions, or refuses to participate in the project fully.
- Student may misuse, waste or destroy art materials carelessly.
- Student may leave a mess.
- The student may rarely show respect for classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student offers destructive critique or does not participate in critiques.