- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: GEOGRAPHY- Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
GEOGRAPHY- Research Project GEOGRAPHY- Research Project Out of 50 Points - Become the class expert on the cultural geography of your country or city to create a thoughtful and concise project. Rubric Code: FC3689 By gmannella Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Geography Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

GEOGRAPHY COUNTRY RESEARCH PROJECT
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Missing 0 pts
Project Appearance and Presentation /15	Excellent Project is clear and well-organized. Layout and appearance is clear and helpful. Fonts and formatting (italics, bold) are clean and guide the reader.	Good Presentation gets the author's points across but has some organizational issues.	Fair Quality of presentation seriously interferes with the information being presented. Quality, formatting, and fonts hinder rather than help the project.	Poor Presentation is poor. Fonts do not match. Format does not match the assignment. Labels are not present. Units are unclear.	Missing Presentation is incomplete or is very difficult to understand.
Quality of Information /15	Excellent The presentation shows information relevant to the country's history, present, and future. There are many interesting facts and there are few questions left unanswered about the country/city.	Good The presentation is accurate, but it shows only a limited ability to make judgments about what really matters in the country/city.	Fair The presentation is mostly just a re-listing of data. It does not show the ability to make judgments about what matters in the country/city.	Poor The presentation is hard to understand or information is incorrect.	Missing Serious gaps/missing key information, or was plagiarized.
Travel Package /20	Excellent Has shown exceptional information and depth/detail in all five points of the travel package. Maps are accurately utilized and illustrate a variety of information.	Good Has delivered adequate information and detail throughout the package. Maps emphasize the points to a degree.	Fair Has delivered information for three or four out of the five points. Detail and depth is lacking. Maps are limited and/or inaccurate representations of the information being presented.	Poor Has delivered information for two of the five points. Information is mostly superficial, and lacking insight and/or depth. Maps are inaccurate, and do not further understanding.	Missing None of the five points covered. No maps used.