Skip to main content
iRubric: Science Fair Project Poster rubric

iRubric: Science Fair Project Poster rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Fair Project Poster 
Science Fair Proposal Project
Rubric Code: FAX75B
By MrsVisser
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric General
Layout
Neatness
Completeness
Overall Impression
  Extremely Poor

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Layout

Extremely Poor

No poster.
Poor

The layout makes little sense with no clear sense of order. It is very difficult to follow.
Fair

The layout makes for difficult reading, but mostly makes sense.
Good

The layout is mostly logical, but a few items seemed to be out of order.
Excellent

The layout is logical and uncluttered and allows for easy reading of the content.
Neatness

Extremely Poor

No poster.
Poor

Project is not typed and the handwriting is sloppy.
Fair
Good

Project is not typed, but is handwritten with care /
Project is typed, but not in the best condition.
Excellent

Project is typed and neatly put together.
Completeness

Title.
Question.
Hypothesis.
Materials List.
Procedure.
Results.
Conclusion.
References.
Extremely Poor

No poster.
Poor

Most items missing (6 out of 8)
Fair

Many items missing (4 out of 8)
Good

Some items missing (2 out of 8)
Excellent

All items on the poster.
Overall impression

Extremely Poor

No poster.
Poor

Poor effort, little thought put into poster.
Most of the information clearly just copied and pasted from other sources.
Fair

Decent effort. Thought evident in parts of the poster.
Some of the information clearly just copied and pasted from other sources.
Good

Good effort. Thought evident throughout poster.
Excellent

Best effort and thought evident in poster.
Content
Title
Question
Hypothesis
Materials List
Procedure
Results Display
Conclusion
References
  Extremely Poor

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Title

Extremely Poor

No title for project.
Poor

Poor/irrelevant title for project.
Fair

Straightforward title.
Good

Good title.
Relevant, but perhaps predictable or boring.
Excellent

Great title. Descriptive and creative. Thought-provoking and interesting.
Question

Extremely Poor

There is no question.
Poor

The question does not make sense / the question is not answerable through scientific investigation / The question is not grade-appropriate
Fair

The question is being asked to explain the experiment.
Good

The question good, but is worded awkwardly.
Excellent

It is a good question, related to the investigation and is easily answerable through scientific investigation.
The question is grade-appropriate.
Hypothesis

Extremely Poor

There is no hypothesis.
Poor

The hypothesis doesn't make sense /
The hypothesis does not try to answer the original question.
Fair

The hypothesis tries to answer the original question, but is incomplete/ doesn't really make sense.
Good

The hypothesis tries to answer the original question, but is not completely successful.
Excellent

The hypothesis answers the original question and is well-formed and thought out.
Materials List

Extremely Poor

No list.
Poor

Many items missing
Fair

A few items missing from the list, some essential to the investigation.
Good

A few items missing from the list, but nothing essential to the investigation.
Excellent

Complete list
Procedure

Extremely Poor

No procedure/
Procedure is so poorly written it might as well not be present.
Poor

Poorly written, difficult to follow, seemingly incomplete, would be extremely difficult to replicate the investigation.
Fair

One or two important details seem to be missing. It would be difficult to replicate the investigation.
Good

Mostly well-written and thought out procedure, but smaller details seem to be missing that might make it difficult to replicate the investigation.
Excellent

Well-written and thought out procedure. The steps follow in a logical order and the investigation would be easy to replicate.
Results Display

Extremely Poor

No results displayed.
Poor

Display method chosen inappropriate.
Fair

Some results are shown, but it's incomplete or difficult to read.
Good

All results are displayed, but it is difficult to read.
Excellent

All results displayed and in the appropriate manner. Easy to read.
Conclusion

Extremely Poor

No conclusion.
Poor

Poor/Irrelevant conclusion.
It does not attempt to answer the original question.
The conclusion does not prove or disprove the hypothesis.
Fair

The conclusion tries to answer the original question, but does not quite succeed.
Good

The conclusion makes sense and is relevant, but perhaps a bit poorly constructed. Key information had been left out.
Excellent

The conclusion answers the question, is well constructed and makes sense.
References

Extremely Poor

None listed
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

Listed




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16