Skip to main content
iRubric: Strength and Conditioning Sem. 1 Final Paper rubric

iRubric: Strength and Conditioning Sem. 1 Final Paper rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Strength and Conditioning Sem. 1 Final Paper 
2 paged, 12 pt font, double spaced paper. This paper will explain the results the kids have graphed from their semester lifting progress. They will need to explain their results for each lift.
Rubric Code: EXXB589
Draft
Public Rubric
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric S & C sem 1 final paper
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

5 pts

Language usage/Mechanics

Poor

more than 5 spelling and punctuation mistakes.
Poor language usage and several incomplete thoughts. Paper did not flow smoothly.
Fair

There were five or fewer spelling and punctuation mistakes. There were few instances of incomplete thoughts. Some parts of the paper did not flow smoothly.
Good

There were 2 or fewer spelling and punctuation mistakes. There were no instances of incomplete thoughts. The paper flows well and addresses all points in a well though-out manner.
Body

Poor

The paper did not meet three or more of the set-up criteria (12 pt. font The paper, double spaced, 2 page length)
Fair

The paper did not meet three or more of the set-up criteria (12 pt. font The paper, double spaced, 2 page length)
Good

The paper did not meet three or more of the set-up criteria (12 pt. font The paper, double spaced, 2 page length)
Content

Poor

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Support for graph topics barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Fair

-Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for research.
--Support for topics in the graph are sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Good

Topic interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.
--Support for the graph topics is well thought out, complete, & in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Correlates with Graph

Poor

Paper does not correlate with graph, there is incorrect support that compares the graph results. The reader is unable to make connections between the graph and the paper.
Fair

paper somewhat correctly describes information gleaned from the graph. Each topic from the graph is briefly talked about. The reader is able to glean some information from the graph by reading the paler.
Good

The information in the paper directly correlates with the information from the graph. The students did a great job of describing each topic in depth and the reader has a clear understanding of what is meant by the graph.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16