Skip to main content
iRubric: Leading a Class Discussion rubric

iRubric: Leading a Class Discussion rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Leading a Class Discussion 
Rubric Code: EXX82C7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Leading a Class Discussion
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Preparation for Discussion

Individual Score

Poor

Unprepared. Misunderstood key elements of the text/issue at hand.
Fair

Somewhat prepared. Showed a partial understanding of the text/issue at hand.
Good

Well-prepared. Showed a good understanding of the issue/text at hand.
Excellent

Clearly well-prepared. Showed an excellent understanding of the issue/text at hand.
Organization

Group Score

Poor

Disorganized. Questions did not build on each other, nor was there a logical progression that could be perceived.
Fair

Somewhat organized. Led class to a basic understanding of the text/issue, though the progression was not always clear.
Good

Well-organized. Questions and presentation led class to a good understanding of the text/issue, but some portions of the discussion might have been better placed.
Excellent

Very well-organized. Discussion questions and presentation built on each other to lead class progressively to an in-depth understanding of the text/issue.
Questions

Group Score

Poor

Discussion questions were poorly formulated, did not elicit discussion and only dealt with the text/issue tangentially or in very vague terms. Comprehension questions may not have ensured full understanding.
Fair

Discussion questions elicited some responses and led class to a basic understanding of the text/issue, but did not delve into the more profound aspects. Comprehension question may not have ensured full understanding.
Good

Good discussion questions that elicited discussion and led class to a good general understanding of the text/issue. Comprehension questions ensured understanding of the text/video.
Excellent

Excellent and creative discussion questions that elicited much discussion and led students to an in-depth understanding of the text/issue. Comprehension questions ensured understanding of the article/video.
Discussion Techniques

Individual Score

Poor

Leader does very little to promote discussion. Either participants are completely unengaged or have taken over the discussion. There was not summary of discussion or the summary was insufficient.
Fair

Leader engages students slightly, or doesn't really lead. Other group members may dominate the discussion. Leader may not promote the discussion of others or does not take a leadership role. Summary of discussion was lacking.
Good

Leader engages students and encourages all students to contribute to discussion but may slightly dominate the discussion or may not promote the discussion of different points of view. Summary of discussion was performed well.
Excellent

Leader engages students;motivating.
Encourages all students to contribute to discussion.
Guides but does not dominate discussion.
Promotes the discussion of different viewpoints and is sensitive to not making group members feel uncomfortable. Summary of discussion was performed well and brought the discussion to a comfortable close.
Presentation

Group Score

Poor

Presentation did not lead to a great understanding of the issue. Pros and Cons spoken of superficially and no greater understanding of the issue emerged.
Fair

Presentation was fair. It may have been lacking in the full depth of the topic. The pros and cons may have been superficially mentioned but why or the number of pros and cons of the issue may have been lacking.
Good

Good presentation of the topic. Presentation was engaging. Class was able to grasp an understanding of the issue, the pros and cons and the relevance of the topic today. Concluding statement gave some insight/prediction surrounding the topic that was applicable.
Excellent

Excellent presentation of the topic. Presentation was engaging and stimulating. Class was able to grasp the full scope of the issue, a greater understanding of the pros and cons and the relevance of the topic today. Concluding statement (after discussion) gave insight/prediction surrounding the topic that was applicable.
Presentation Skills

Individual Score

Poor

Presenter stares
at slides or at
note cards
throughout presentation not
making an effort
to make eye
contact. Presenter
talks too quietly
for audience to
understand.
Presentation
slides are only
words, no visuals. Did not speak for full time.
Fair

Presenter did not
prepare adequately for
the presentation.
Presenter relies too much on notes or the
slides. Presenter makes
slight effort to make
eye contact with the
audience.
Good

Presenter maintains
adequate eye contact
throughout the
presentation but is not well rehearsed
even
though the presentation
content is good.
Possibly too many
wordy slides.
Excellent

Presenter maintains eye
contact throughout the
presentation. The
presenter is confident and well rehearsed
either they
memorized their section or only
had note cards.
Presenter's slides add
to the content, do not
distract from what
he/she is saying. Presenter spoke for the full time.
Team Preparation

Group Score

Poor

Team was not prepared. Either material was not emailed to students two days prior to the discussion or students were not ready to begin in class. (Time was wasted waiting for them to set up which took a lot of class time)
Fair

Team was prepared for all aspects of the assignment. Material was emailed to classmates and professor two days before the discussion but not by the deadline and or team was not ready to begin presentation on time.
Good

N/A
Excellent

Team was well prepared for all aspects of the assignment. Material (article/video, vocabulary, comprehension questions, discussion questions)was emailed to classmates and professor two days before the discussion (by noon) and team was ready to begin presentation on time.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16