Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Petrachan or Shakespearean Sonnet: Circle type rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Petrachan or Shakespearean Sonnet: Circle type
Original Sonnet Writing & Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code:
EX555A9
By
katiedube
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Sonnet
Does Not Meet Standards
0 pts
Below Standards
16 pts
Meeting Standards
20 pts
Exceeding Standards
25 pts
Understanding of Form
Does Not Meet Standards
Poem strays significantly from the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are fewer than 10 lines of poetry, does not follow iambic pentametre (less than 9 syllables) and has not followed any ryhme scheme.
Below Standards
Poem strays somewhat from the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are at least 10 lines of poetry, generally follows iambic pentametre (9-11 syllables) and has generally followed a ryhme scheme.
Meeting Standards
Poem is mostly written in the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are at least 12 lines of poetry, generally follows iambic pentameter (9-11 syllables) and has generally followed a ryhme scheme.
Exceeding Standards
Poem is complete and follows its intended form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen), i.e. has 14 lines of poetry, three quatrains, uses iambic pentameter, has a couplet and rhyme scheme.
Sound Devices (Rhyme, Alliteration)
Does Not Meet Standards
Little to no usage of sound devices. Musicality of poem is nonexistent. The poem trudges along and is truly unvaried. No examples are underlined.
Below Standards
Cursory usage of sound devices, with some nice usage of alliteration, assonance, etc. While decent, the poem still lacks a certain musicality that would make it flow better. Less than 5 examples are underlined.
Meeting Standards
Good usage of sound devices. Some devices give the poem a nice flow, yet they are too far apart to make the poem cohesive as a whole or you only use one type of sound device. 5 examples are underlined, but do not represent the sound devices accurately.
Exceeding Standards
Rhyme, alliteration, consonance, and assonance create a flowing, organic musical quality to the poem. 5 examples are underlined. Multiple thoughtful, well placed, and easy to hear examples in oral reading.
Originality and Revision
Does Not Meet Standards
Poem shows virtually no originality or voice. Poem has little imagery and sound quality. No title. The poem is not creative and appears to be rushed. This is evident in too obvious meaning and a lack of originality.
Below Standards
Poem shows a fair amount of originality and thoughtfulness, yet it is sprinkled with cliche ideas/idioms.Has cursory language, imagery, and sound quality. Title is uninteresting.
The poem is creative, but appears to be rushed.
Meeting Standards
Poem is thoughtful and creative. A couple of phrases or ideas may be revisited, but the overall product is carefully written. Title is good.
Exceeding Standards
Poem has an engaging title. It is evident that the poet put thought into the diction and was innovative in conveying the ideas and emotions of the sonnet.
Formal Usage of Language
Does Not Meet Standards
Punctuation and spelling is poor and not reflective of student's true capabilities. Poor mechanics interferes with the poem's readability. No apparent revision done in mechanics.
Below Standards
Errors are noticeable. Spelling and punctuation are fair yet not reflective of student's skills. Poem is readable, yet mistakes distract the reader. Punctuation usage is acceptable for tone of poem.
Meeting Standards
Few grammatical errors that do not distract the reader. Punctuation is congruent with the tone of the poem.
Exceeding Standards
No punctuation or spelling errors. Shows a strong grasp of poetic language through creative use of punctuation.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.