Skip to main content
iRubric: Case Study Research Paper - Writing Practices rubric

iRubric: Case Study Research Paper - Writing Practices rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Study Research Paper - Writing Practices 
You are required to write a report between 1500 and 2000 words on the writing practices of one student throughout a writing unit. You are required to: Describe the student Discuss the student’s attitudes towards and perceptions of writing Describe the activities the child engages in during the writing process Discuss the metacognitive processes that the child engages in during the writing process Evaluate the student’s approach towards writing.
Rubric Code: DX82WA3
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Child Study Paper
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

Description of the student
5 %

Describe the student

Poor

Describes student vaguely. Minimal biographical information is presented.
Fair

Describes student. Some biographical information is presented.
Good

Describes student clearly and detailed. Includes biographical information necessary for understanding the student's writing practices.
Excellent

Describes student clearly and detailed. Includes all biographical information necessary for understanding the student's writing practices.
Attitude towards writing
15 %

Discuss the student’s attitudes towards and perceptions of writing

Poor

There is very little discussion of student's attitudes towards writing. Little or no evidence from data collected is presented to support all claims.
Fair

Discusses the student's attitudes towards writing. Provides some evidence from data collected to support claims.
Good

Discusses in detail the student's attitudes towards writing. Provides some evidence from data collected to support claims.
Excellent

Discusses in detail the student's attitudes towards writing. Provides clear evidence from data collected to support all claims.
Writing Activities
15 %

Describe the activities the child engages in during the writing process

Poor

Identifies and describes activities the student engages in during writing. Little or no evidence from data collected is presented to support all claims.
Fair

Identifies and describes some of the activities that the student engages in during writing
Provides some evidence from data collected to support claims.
Good

Identifies and describes in detail some activities that the student engages in during writing that are pertinent to writing.
Provides some evidence from data collected to support claims.
Excellent

Identifies and describes in detail the major activities that the student engages in during writing that are pertinent to writing. Provides clear evidence from data collected to support all claims.
Metacognitive processes
20 %

Discuss the metacognitive processes that the child engages in during the writing process

Poor

Identifies and discusses metacognitive processes that the student engages in during writing. Little or no evidence is provided from data collected and literature to support claims.
Fair

Identifies and discusses metacognitive processes that the student engages in during writing. Provides evidence from data collected or literature to support claims.
Good

Identifies and discusses metacognitive processes that the student engages in during writing. Provides some evidence from data collected and literature to support claims.
Excellent

Identifies and discusses key metacognitive processes that the student engages in during writing. Provides clear evidence from data collected and literature to support claims.
Evaluation
20 %

Evaluate the student’s approach towards writing.

Poor

Does not discuss the student's approach to writing. Merely identifies or mentions the approach. Very little evidence is provided.
Fair

Discusses the student's approach to writing. Provides some evidence from the data collected and from the literature exposed to in the course.
Good

Discusses the student's approach to writing using evidence from the data collected and from the literature exposed to in the course.
Excellent

Discusses in depth the student's approach to writing using clear evidence from the data collected and from the literature exposed to in the course.
Evidence of research
15 %

Use of literature from the course
Evidence that other literature was sourced
Appropriate referencing (APA)

Poor

Uses no other resource to provide insight and/or expand on information provided in unit.
Fair

Uses a minimum of other resources to provide insight and/or expand on information provided in unit.
Good

Uses some resources to provide insight and/or expand on information provided in unit.
Sources are cited and referenced appropriately.
Excellent

Successfully uses other resources to provide insight and/or expand on information provided in unit.
Sources are cited and referenced appropriately.
Overall paper organization
10 %

Organization of content.
Includes grammar and spelling

Poor

Information scattered and disorganized. Grammar and spelling so poor, sections of paper are impossible to understand.
Fair

Information is orderly, but difficult to follow or information is frequently repeated. Grammar and spelling errors present, but paper is understandable
Good

Good format. Easy to follow and understand.
Excellent

Excellent format, use of correct terminology. Concise and professional.



Keywords:
  • Writing

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16