Skip to main content
iRubric: CO302 Grief Counselling rubric

iRubric: CO302 Grief Counselling rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CO302 Grief Counselling 
CO302 Grief Counselling
Assessment 1 Case Study
Rubric Code: DX66W7W
By meskwaki
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Assessment 1 Case Study
  High Distinction

5 pts

Distinction

4 pts

Credit

3 pts

Pass

2 pts

Fail

1 pts

Introduction
20 %

Introduces and succinctly clarifies the situation faced by the grieving client, the unique variables related to the presenting issue and the approach that should be taken with the grieving client.
High Distinction

A thorough outline of the client’s situation including all relevant variables and the appropriate approach to be taken.
Distinction

An accurate outline of the client’s situation which includes most of the unique variables and an appropriate theoretical approach.
Credit

An appropriate introduction, but may be lacking some aspects of the client’s situation, or may lack all of the related variables or an appropriate theoretical approach.
Pass

An adaquate introduction is made, but may not be precise in either it’s clarity of the client’s situation, the associated variables or the approach to be used.
Fail

An inadaquate introduction which does not include a sound understanding of the client’s situation, the associated variables or theoretical approach to be taken.
Enter Title
Main Body
55 %

The theories, concepts and ideas chosen match effectively with client's complicated grief issues.
High Distinction

Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of how grief theories, concepts and ideas match the issues the client is relating.
Distinction

Demonstrates a very high level of understanding of how the grief theories, concepts and ideas relate to the clients issues.
Credit

Demonstrates a coherent understanding but may not have matched all of the client’s issues effectively.
Pass

Demonstrates an adaquate understanding of the theories and concepts, but has not made connections to client’s issues.
Fail

Demonstrates and inadaquate understanding of the client’s issues and how they relate to the concepts, theories and ideas of grief.
Main Body
%

An insightful explanation of key links between the issues faced by the grieving client and the relevant therapuetic approach is provided.
High Distinction

Insightful and concise explanation of the key links between client issues and therapeutic approach used.
Distinction

Relevant explanation of the key links between client issues and therapeutic approach used.
Credit

Appropriate explanations of links between client issues and approach used, but may not have included all issues provided in the case.
Pass

Adaquate, but poor explanations of links between client issues and a theoretical approach.
Fail

Not able to provide links of client issues to a theoretical approach.
Enter Title
Conclusion
15 %

A succinct and precise summary of the relevant issues facing the client and the relevance of the theoretical approach in treatment as well as future directions and follow-up.
High Distinction

Excellent and precise summary of the client's issues and how they relate to the chosen theoretical approach and future direction.
Distinction

Very good summary of the key client issues and chosen theoretical approach and future direction.
Credit

Appropriate summary of the client situation, but a sound future direction or follow-up plan for client.
Pass

Satisfactory, but weak summary that pertains to overall client issues and what future direction or follow-up would be taken.
Fail

Conclusion is weak or absent.
Enter Title
Overall Quality of Paper
10 %

The quality of the writing style, the use of APA formatting and the referencing of relevant resources throughout.
High Distinction

Excellent structure and logical flow of information with correct spelling, punctuation and grammar with in the APA format. All relevant resources were referenced.
Distinction

Very good structure and logical flow of information with correct spelling and punctuation in most instances. Limited errors.
Credit

Appropriate structure and logical flow of information with some errors in expression and/or presentation.
Pass

Satisfactory structure and flow of information, however there is evidence of a number of grammatical errors, a lack of clarity and/or weaknesses in presentation.
Fail

Inadaquate structure and an awkward flow of information. The overall expression and/or presentation is poor.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16