Skip to main content
iRubric: Social Studies Online Discussion TDA Rubric

iRubric: Social Studies Online Discussion TDA Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Social Studies Online Discussion TDA Rubric 
Rubric to be used in all long form writing assessment
Rubric Code: D2WC3A9
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Class Discussion Rubric
Text Dependent Analysis
  Excellent

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Satisfactory

2 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Quality of Initial Post

Excellent

-Effectively addresses all parts of the task indicating in-depth analytic understanding.
-Strong organizational structure.
-Few errors,if any, in writing mechanics.
-Effective use of text evidence and content vocabulary.
-Content information stated correctly, in correct chronology where necessary.
-Student writing flawlessly connects content subjects within chapter and between chapters.
Proficient

-Adequately addresses all parts of the task indicating sufficient analytic understanding.
-Appropriate organizational structure.
-some errors in writing mechanics.
-Sufficient use of main ideas in text evidence and content vocabulary.
-Content information stated correctly with few errors, in correct chronology where necessary.
-Student writing appropriately connects content subjects within chapter and between chapters.
Satisfactory

-Inconsistently addresses all parts of the task indicating in-depth analytic understanding.
-Weak organizational structure that inconsistently supports focus and ideas.
-Errors in writing mechanics in at least half of sentences.
-Vague use of text evidence and content vocabulary lacking detail or specific examples.
-Content information lacks clarity and evidence of understanding at times.
-Chronology may include errors.
-Weak connections between content subjects.
Needs Improvement

-Minimally addresses part(s) of the task indicating in-adequate analytic understanding of the text.
-Minimal evidence of introduction, body, or conclusion.
-Errors in writing mechanics found throughout.
-Insufficient or nonexistent use of text evidence and content vocabulary.
-Content information stated incorrectly and in no chronological order.
-Student writing makes no connection between chapter subjects.
Quality of Comments and Discussion

Excellent

-Comments on more than two other student posts.
-Comments go beyond "I agree" and stimulate further discussion, including additional questions to original posts.
-Comments are respectful and appropriate
Proficient

-Comments on 2 other student posts.
-Comments go beyond "I agree" and stimulate further discussion
-Comments are respectful and appropriate
Satisfactory

-Comments on only one other student post.
-Comments are brief and do not further the conversation.
-Comments are respectful and appropriate
Needs Improvement

-Comments are missing or disrespectful and inappropriate.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16