Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Curriculum Design /Analysis Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Curriculum Design /Analysis Rubric
Curriculum Design /Analysis Rubric
Curriculum Project
Rubric Code:
CXWC4CC
By
helfleslie
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Curriculum Design
C & I 501
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Unacceptable
0 pts
Core Content
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The curriculum has direct explicit connections to appropriate grade level and to the content standards (national, state, and/or local)
Meets Expectations
The curriculum has some connections to appropriate grade level and to the content standards (national, state, and/or local)
Needs Improvement
It is unclear whether the curriculum is grade appropriate and/or explicitly connected to the standards.
Unacceptable
It is clear that the curriculum is not age appropriate and/or tied to the standards.
Integration and/or Technology
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is strong evidence of integration of other disciplines and/or technology throughout the unit. Integration is explicitly stated.
Meets Expectations
There is some evidence of integration, and it is explicitly stated.
Needs Improvement
There is some evidence of integration, but it is not explicitly stated.
Unacceptable
There is poor or no evidence of integration.
Assessment
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Many references exist for feedback to both teacher and students concerning progress toward desired results in the curriculum. Comprehensive pre-assessments are included. Student growth is encouraged.
Meets Expectations
Some opportunities exist for feedback to both teacher and students concerning progress toward desired results. Pre-assessments are included but may need to be tailored for individual needs. Student growth is encouraged.
Needs Improvement
Few opportunities exist for feedback to both teacher and students concerning progress toward desired results. Pre-assessments may not be present. Student growth may be encouraged.
Unacceptable
No opportunities exist for feedback to both teacher and students concerning progress toward desired results. Pre-assessments are not present. Student growth is not encouraged.
Transition
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Grade levels begin and end with content that can easily be continued the following academic year. Each level begins with a concise review re-introducing students to content key concepts. Ends the year with a clear goal in mind for the following academic year.
Meets Expectations
Grade level curriculum references previous knowledge and attempts to make connections between lprevious year's curriculum and current year's curriculum. Does not set expectations for following year's curriculum.
Needs Improvement
Grade level curriculum refers to previously learned content but does not provide opportunity to re-enage in content material. Does not set expectations for following year's curriculum.
Unacceptable
Grade level curriculum introduces new content without making any connection to previously learned concepts.
Instruction/Pedagogy
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is strong evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of of learner styles, and address various learning levels.
Meets Expectations
There is some evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of learner styles, and address various learning levels.
Needs Improvement
There is little evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of learner styles, or address various learning levels.
Unacceptable
There is no evidence that instructional strategies are based on student goals, are learner centered and inclusive of learner styles, or address varying learning levels.
Differentiation
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The curriculum provides ample provisions for more motivated students, students with special needs, multiple methods of demonstration of learning, and effective remediation plans.
Meets Expectations
The curriculum provides some provisions for more motivated students, students with special needs, multiple methods of demonstration of learning, and effective remediation plans.
Needs Improvement
The curriculum provides little provisions for more motivated students, students with special needs, multiple methods of demonstration of learning, and effective remediation plans.
Unacceptable
The curriculum provides no provisions for more motivated students, students with special needs, multiple methods of demonstration of learning, or effective remediation plans.
Instructional Resources
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
All of the resources are provided and continuously screened for accuracy and authenticity. They are relevant to the curriculum and cross-curricular when appropriate. The resources are rich, varied, age/skill appropriate and derived from multiple sources.
Meets Expectations
Most of the resources are provided and continuously screened for accuracy and authenticity. They are relevant to the curriculum and cross-curricular when appropriate. Most of the resources are rich, varied, age/skill appropriate and derived from multiple sources.
Needs Improvement
The resources are provided but may not be continuously screened for accuracy and authenticity. They are relevant to the curriculum but may not be cross-curricular. The resources may be rich, varied, age/skill appropriate or derived from multiple sources.
Unacceptable
Few of the resources are provided and none are continuously screened for accuracy and authenticity. They may not be relevant to the curriculum or cross-curricular. The resources may not be rich, varied, age/skill appropriate or derived from multiple sources.
Sustainability
5 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is strong evidence that the curriculum includes research-based, "best practice" content. The curriculum and its success rate has been studied for more than three years.
Meets Expectations
There is some evidence that the curriculum includes research-based, "best practice" content. The curriculum and its success rate has been studied for at least three years.
Needs Improvement
There is little evidence that the curriculum includes research-based, "best practice" content. The curriculum and its success rate may not have been studied for at least three years.
Unacceptable
There is no evidence that the curriculum includes research-based, "best practice" content. The curriculum and its success rate have not been studied at length.
Keywords:
curriculum design curriculum analysis
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.