- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Evaluation of Peer Campaign rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Evaluation of Peer Campaign Our Peer's Evaluation of NPP Campaign Assessment for Peer Pressure Campaign Rubric Code: CX5887W By cookecd5 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Peer Campaign
	good 20 pts	Fair 12 pts	poor 6 pts
Content: Feedback	good Students show grasp of the project. Have proven their understanding of the atom, nuclear reactions and nuclear energy with well thought out presentation and work.	Fair Student shows a general grasp of the atom, nuclear reactions and nuclear power, but some key ideas are lacking in the presentation. Project turned in late.	poor Student lacks a plan to help their campaign. Little understanding shown in project turned in.
Presentation: Feedback	good Students presentation is complete.Their campaign ideas were expressed clearly in their proposal.Group billboards/bumper stickers are complete and leave clear understanding of their position.	Fair Students presentation was done satisfactorally.Their campaign ideas were covered but may have been a little confusing to the audience.Billboards/bumpers are complete but lack complete understanding of their position.	poor Students campaign presentation was vague and short.Group billboards show little effort or is not complete.Not all of the project requirements were covered in the project.
Visual/Creativity: Feedback	good Students work is fresh with new ideas.Billboard/ bumper stickers are colorful and catchy.Excellent student effort is exhibited throughout project.	Fair Students work is complete but lacks creativity.Billboards/ bumper stickers are compete but no slogan and done with minimal color.Overall assignment completed.	poor Students work is incomplete.Billboard/bumper stickers were not turned in.Work that was turned in lacks all creativity and was hastily prepared to turn something in.
Video Commercial: Feedback	good Students took full advantage of expressing themselves on camera.Commercial was well thought out and ran the full 60 seconds and was coherent and flowing. Use of two media presentations.	Fair Students completed assignment, but it lacks enthusiasm for the project/creativity was to a minimum.Video was a few short, lacked some coherency and flow. Use of one media presentation.	poor Students video was short and incomplete. Spokesperson read lines like a robot. Video was not clear.