Skip to main content
iRubric: COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Reaction Paper rubric

iRubric: COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Reaction Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
COUN 5320 Penner & Penner Reaction Paper 
COUN 5320 Facing Shadows Brief Reaction Paper
Due Tuesday, 11/12@11:550pm: Syllabus Instruction: "Read and submit a personal critical response . . . The response may include a discussion of the issues raised, a survey of the material, questions regarding the nature of the material or personal comments on the point of view of the author and your reaction. This paper should reflect a good understanding and comprehension of the material in the book. Your paper should be a minimum of 1250 words and not exceed 2000 words.
Rubric Code: CBXX48
By pcummins
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Reaction Paper Rubric
Total value 45 points
  Poor

10 pts

Fair

25 pts

Good

35 pts

Excellent

45 pts

Reading Completion
20 %

Responsiveness to Assigned Reading(s)
Poor

2pts. Response reflects no evidence of assigned readings - off-topic.
Fair

5pts. Although response is on topic, it does not explicitly reflect the assigned readings -- it could have been written without completing the readings.
Good

7pts. Somewhat unclear that readings were understood or not all readings explicitly included.
Excellent

9pts. Very clear that all assigned readings were understood by incorporation into reaction.
Personalization
35 %

Exploration of Personal Reactions
Poor

3.5pts. Shows minimal awareness of personal reactions, focusing solely on intellectualized reactions.
Fair

8.75pts. Identifies personal reactions, but demonstrates little exploration or understanding of these reactions; avoids discomfort and uncertainty.
Good

12.25pts. Discusses personal reactions, including exploration of the basis for these reactions (e.g., recognizes new perspectives about own cultural rules and biases).
Excellent

15.75pts. Deeply explores personal reactions, including exploration of the basis for these reactions (e.g., articulates insights into own cultural rules and biases); willingness to sit with uncertainty and not seek easy answers.
Application
15 %

Application of Readings to Personal and Professional Self
Poor

1.5pts. No mention of implications of the readings for student's personal or professional attitudes and/or behaviors.
Fair

3.75pts. Implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes / behaviors minimal or perfunctory.
Good

5.25pts. Student addresses implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes and/or behaviors.
Excellent

6.75pts. Student identifies and discusses implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes and/or behaviors in a complex way.
Additional Questions
10 %

Questions Raised by the Readings.
Poor

1pt. Response does not include any questions raised for the student by the readings.
Fair

2.5pts. Response includes 1 or more questions, but these are either questions already raised in the readings or questions not directly inspired by the readings. Question(s) are clearly identified
Good

3.5pts. Response includes 1 or more questions raised by the reading. but the question is yes/no or focused on simple facts -- unlikely to foster discussion. Question(s) are clearly identified
Excellent

4.5pts. Response includes 2 or more questions raised by the reading(s) that are integrative without a conclusive answer and thus are likely to foster further thought & discussion. Question(s) are clearly identified
Technical Writing
12 %

Grammar, Spelling, Overall Professional Appearance.
Poor

1.2pts. Response contains so many typographical and grammatical errors as to be difficult to read.
Fair

3pts. Response contains a distracting level of typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines frequently missed.
Good

4.2pts. Response contains minimal typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines closely followed.
Excellent

5.4pts. Response contains nearly zero typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines strictly adhered to in all areas including any sources referenced in the paper.
Use of Words
8 %

Quantity & Efficiancy
Poor

.8pts. Less than 1250 or more than 2000 words. Tended to be sparse or wordy
Fair

2pts. Less than 1250 or more than 2000 words, but made good use of allocation.
Good

2.8pts. Between 1250 and 2000 words but ended to be sparse or wordy
Excellent

3.6pts. Between 1250 and 2000 words. Made good use of allocation.



Keywords:
  • Reaction paper



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98