Skip to main content
iRubric: Experiment/Lab Design for Fluids - Science Rubric

iRubric: Experiment/Lab Design for Fluids - Science Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Experiment/Lab Design for Fluids - Science Rubric 
Experiment Design Rubric
Your grade is based on your ability to design a lab report. NOTE: Procedures should include any safety precautions needed for the lab, and you need to state the independent and dependent variables in your hypothesis. You will not be performing the lab, instead, your classmates will have an opportunity to do your lab. You are responsible for providing the necessary materials so that your peers will be able perform the experiment.
Rubric Code: C2W3WCW
By lucianna
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Lab report
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Emerging

2 pts

Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

1 pts

background information
5 pts

Excellent

Clear detailed background information. All information related to the experiment and investigation is covered in background. information is not plagiarized and the source is cited
Good

background is good but lacks complete explanation. sources are cited
Emerging

Incomplete. lacks detail and descriptions are incoherent or incomplete. sources are not documented and or plagiarized
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Hypothesis
2 pts

(includes independent and dependent variables)
Excellent

Is stated as an if...then ... because ... statement or strong hypothesis.
Is directly related to the problem with important supporting details about what may be causing the problem or what could be done to solve it.
Good

Is stated in if...then... because ... format or strong hypothesis but needs to relate to the problem more directly and identify a realistic "because" statement.
Emerging

Needs to be stated as if...then... because ... statement or strong hypothesis. Needs to relate to the problem more directly.
Needs supporting detail (a better because).
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Materials list
5 pts

Excellent

List is complete for an accurate replication of the experiment. List includes quantitative measurements using the metric system.
Good

List is complete but quantities not always there or missing completely.
Emerging

Listed but not complete. Quantities missing or are rarely there or the metric system isn't used for data collection.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Procedures
10 pts

Excellent

Written as though giving directions. Written in complete sentences.
Are complete with no steps missing. A model or diagram is used as needed.
Good

Logical sequence but missing steps. Some incomplete sentences. The model or diagram that is used is incomplete or distracting.
Emerging

Needs more steps for the lab to be reliable.<BR>
Needs complete sentences. Model isn't used when it would have been an obvious addition.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Tables, Graphs, & Data Analysis
8 pts

Excellent

Accurate observation table, data table,
and graph are present. The data graph is properly set up and is supported by the data in the chart. Includes relevant qualitative data and other observations.
Good

Observation table or data table needs to be properly labeled to make sense of the data and /or graph needs to be properly labeled to make better sense of the results.
Emerging

Data missing from the observation table, data table, and or graph.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.
Analysis and conclusion
5 pts

Excellent

Conclusion sums up the data and analyzes how the test procedures could have been improved and how the data relates to the hypothesis.
Good

Some questions about the data are not discussed or have incomplete answers conclusions.
Emerging

Hypothesis needs to be
restated and data used to describe how it is or is not supported needs more analysis.
Incomplete or Unsatisfactory

This part of the report is missing or doesn't provide enough learning evidence.



Keywords:
  • Observation, Research, Problem, Hypothesis, Procedure, independent variable, dependent variable, constants, control, data table, graph, results statement, conclusion

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16