Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Panel Discussion for Merchant of Venice rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Panel Discussion for Merchant of Venice
Panel Discussion
Panel Discussion between those believing Shylock is a victim or a villain.
Rubric Code:
BXA4X77
By
margaretdoyle
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Panel Discussion
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Persuasiveness
Good
The student was able to persuade or recruit the majority of the audience to join their point of view.
Fair
The student was able to persuade or recruit some of the audience to join their point of view.
Poor
The student was not able to persuade or recruit much of the audience to join their point of view.
Organization
Good
The student's method of speaking was organized and followed logically with the flow of the discussion.
Fair
The student's method of speaking was understandable and followed somewhat with the flow of the discussion.
Poor
The student's method of speaking was unorganized and/or did not follow logically with the flow of the discussion.
Content
Good
The content spoken by the student was clear and accurate to their position's point of view and used appropriate quotes from the play.
All quotes were cited correctly.
Fair
The content spoken by the student was somewhat clear and fairly accurate to their position's point of view and used inappropriate quotes. Some quotes were cited correctly.
Poor
The content spoken by the student was not clear and/or was inaccurate to their position's point of view and did not use any supporting quotes. Incorrect citations were used or quotes were not used as support.
Participation
Good
Student participated to a very good extent.
Fair
Student participated in the discussion a fair amount.
Poor
Student did not adequately participate in the discussion.
Teamwork
Good
Student was able to work on appropriate side very well, working with his/her debate mates. They likewise answered well the opposing side.
Fair
Student was able to work on appropriate side fairly, working with his/her debate mates. They began to answer the opposing side.
Poor
The student did not work well with their debate mates and/or did not answer the opposing side sufficiently.
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.