- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Art History Reading/Writing Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Art History Reading/Writing Rubric Active Reading Rubric The rubric evaluates a students active reading of The Annotated Mona Lisa and the written responses to the art history readings within the book. Rubric Code: BX66A34 By aunger Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Reading Grade Levels: 9-12

Art History Reading & Writing
	Poor 1 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 5 pts	COMMENTS (N/A)
Reading/Thinking/Inquiry	Poor Little to no effort was made during class time. Little effort went into reading the chapter. Student barely looked at the material to get any sort of understanding.	Good Student talked during some of the class time. Some effort went into reading the chapter. Student looked at the material somewhat to get a better understanding.	Excellent Class time was used wisely. Much effort went into thoroughly reading the chapter. Student took initiative and looked closely at the material to gain a better understanding.	COMMENTS
Reader Connections	Poor The student documented few/no connections to literary elements in the art history reading. Student does not make it clear that they comprehend any of the reading by providing little to no response to the writing prompt.	Good The student documented some connections to literary elements in the art history reading. Student makes it somewhat clear that they comprehend the reading by providing a response to the writing prompt.	Excellent The student documented many connections to key literary elements in the art history reading. Student makes it very clear that they comprehend the reading by providing a thorough response to the writing prompt.	COMMENTS
Interpretation	Poor The student superficially analyzed the text and/or showed limited understanding of the material.	Good The student asked sufficiently analyzed the text and/or showed a adequate understanding of the material.	Excellent The student critically analyzed the text and/or showed a meaningful understanding of the material.	COMMENTS
Response	Poor The student did not participate in the written response activity.	Good The student satisfactorily reflected upon the text during the written response activity.	Excellent The student was able to share relevant findings and ideas during the written activity.	COMMENTS